Search
Tools
Listening
Reading
1. Academic
2. General
Writing
1. IELTSWriting Checker
2. IELTS Writing Samples
Speaking

Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.

Increasing the price of petrol is the best way to solve growing traffic and pollution problems. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Increasing the price of petrol is the best way to solve growing traffic and pollution problems. gmBd

Every year the vehicles on this earth will continue to increase. As well as the level of fuel consumption for vehicles. There will be causes resulting from the increase of these two cases, one of them is pollution. There is a statement that increasing the price of petrol is the best way to solve growing traffic and pollution problems. Conversely, I disagree with this opinion. This is a complex statement. So we should start by looking at the positive side from this statement. Firstly, the country will get more income. By getting more income, this country can pay the debt that the country has. If the country's economy is stable, so this argument is good way to improve the country's economy. Turning into the negative side from the increased price of fuel. There are more disadvantages from this statement rather than the advantages. First of all, I think traffic and pollution problems cannot be resolved by increasing the price of petrol, because

Every year the vehicles on this earth will continue to increase. As well
 as the level of fuel consumption for vehicles. There will be causes resulting from the increase of these two cases, one of them is pollution. There is a You use this word too often, consider replacing it withcommentannouncementremarkworddescriptionproclamation
statement
 that increasing the price of petrol is the best way to solve growing traffic and pollution problems. Conversely
, I disagree with this opinion.

This is a complex You use this word too often, consider replacing it withcommentannouncementremarkworddescriptionproclamation
statement
. This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:consequently
So
 we should This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :initiate
start
 by looking at the This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:beneficial
positive
 side from this You use this word too often, consider replacing it withcommentannouncementremarkworddescriptionproclamation
statement
. Firstly
, the country will This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :acquire
get
 more income. By getting more income, this country can pay the debt that the country has. If the country's economy is stable, This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:consequently
so
 this argument is Please check whether an article is missing: "a good".a good
good
 way to This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :ameliorate
improve
 the country's economy.

Turning into the This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:adverse
negative
 side from the increased price of fuel. There are more disadvantages from this You use this word too often, consider replacing it withcommentannouncementremarkworddescriptionproclamation
statement
rather
 than the advantages. This phrase is redundant. Consider using "first".First
First of all
, I This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :reckonassumebelieveconsider
think
 traffic and pollution problems cannot be resolved
 by increasing the price of petrol, Please add a punctuation mark at the end of paragraphbecause.because!because?because:because,because;
because