Search
Vocabularying
Listening
Reading
1. Academic
2. General
Writing
1. IELTSWriting Checker
2. IELTS Writing Samples
Speaking
1. Latest Topics
2. Speaking Club

Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.

Increasing the price of petrol is the best way to solve growing traffic and pollution problems. To what extends do you agree or disagree? What other measures do you think might be effective?

Increasing the price of petrol is the best way to solve growing traffic and pollution problems. What other measures do you think might be effective? aD6V

Traffic and pollution have been two major issues around the world. It is believed that increasing the price of petrol is the best solution. It is my firm belief that increasing the petrol price doesn’t have an effect on cutting down pollution. However, countries can find some alternative energy sources in order to tackle these ongoing two problems. On the one hand, there are people who think that increasing the price of petrol will reduce its use thus, decreasing traffic congestion and pollution. It is pointed out that raising the petrol price is a short term measure and there is no effect on pollution. Whereas the number of cars has decreased on roads, it largely affects prices of food and other goods, too. For instance, in my country, Turkey, everything depends on each other like a chain. It means that the higher the price of fuel is, the higher the price on food is. This leads to inflation in poor countries. As a result of this, people have to survive to buy even a slice of bread with their wage. On the other hand, governments can use sustainable resources like solar energy and wind power. It can provide multiple solutions for both pollution and congestion. For example, If transportation vehicles run on solar energy, it would be cheaper. It also contributes less carbon dioxide emission to the environment. By way of illustration, wind energy is renewable and it is also a source of clean, non-polluting, electricity. According to research, the countries using wind energy have less gas emissions and their air quality is better than those not using wind energy. In conclusion, we can say it is not the best solution to increase the price of fuel for less traffic and less pollution. Thus, it can be highly recommended that the best way of decreasing pollution and traffic is to use sustainable energy. In addition, we should be aware that there is just one world.

You use this word too often, consider replacing it withtransportationshipmentservicetravelinfluxgridlock
Traffic
 and You use this word too often, consider replacing it withabuseinfectioncorruptiondeterioration
pollution
 have been two major issues around the world. It is believed
 that increasing the You use this word too often, consider replacing it withfarepayfeepremiumfigurevaluation
price
 of You use this word too often, consider replacing it withcrude oilgasolinegasfuelnatural gaskerosene
petrol
 is the best solution. It is my firm belief that increasing the You use this word too often, consider replacing it withcrude oilgasolinegasfuelnatural gaskerosene
petrol
You use this word too often, consider replacing it withfarepayfeepremiumfigurevaluation
price
 doesn’t have an effect on cutting down You use this word too often, consider replacing it withabuseinfectioncorruptiondeterioration
pollution
. However
, You use this word too often, consider replacing it withlandpeopleregioncommunitysocietystate
countries
 can find This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:a number of
some
 alternative You use this word too often, consider replacing it withstrengthtoughnesspowervitalitystaminaefficiency
energy
 sources in order to tackle these ongoing two problems.

On the one hand, there are This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :individualsnationsociety
people
 who This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :reckonassumebelieveconsider
think
 that increasing the You use this word too often, consider replacing it withfarepayfeepremiumfigurevaluation
price
 of You use this word too often, consider replacing it withcrude oilgasolinegasfuelnatural gaskerosene
petrol
 will This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :alleviate
reduce
 its This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :exploit
use
thus
, decreasing You use this word too often, consider replacing it withtransportationshipmentservicetravelinfluxgridlock
traffic
 congestion and You use this word too often, consider replacing it withabuseinfectioncorruptiondeterioration
pollution
. It is pointed
 out that raising the You use this word too often, consider replacing it withcrude oilgasolinegasfuelnatural gaskerosene
petrol
You use this word too often, consider replacing it withfarepayfeepremiumfigurevaluation
price
 is a short term measure and there is no effect on You use this word too often, consider replacing it withabuseinfectioncorruptiondeterioration
pollution
. Whereas the number of cars has decreased on roads, it largely
 affects You use this word too often, consider replacing it withfarepayfeepremiumfigurevaluation
prices
 of food and other This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :productscommoditiesmerchandises
goods
, too. For instance
, in my You use this word too often, consider replacing it withrusticbucolichomeyagrarianprovincial
country
, Turkey, everything depends on each other like a chain. It means that the higher the You use this word too often, consider replacing it withfarepayfeepremiumfigurevaluation
price
 of fuel is, the higher the You use this word too often, consider replacing it withfarepayfeepremiumfigurevaluation
price
 on food is. This leads to inflation in poor You use this word too often, consider replacing it withlandpeopleregioncommunitysocietystate
countries
. As a result
 of this, This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :individualsnationsociety
people
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:ought to
have to
 survive to This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :purchase
buy
 even a slice of bread with their wage.

On the other hand
, This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :national authoritiespublic authorities
governments
 can This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :exploit
use
 sustainable resources like solar You use this word too often, consider replacing it withstrengthtoughnesspowervitalitystaminaefficiency
energy
 and You use this word too often, consider replacing it withgustairgalebreezecycloneblast
wind
 power. It can provide multiple solutions for both You use this word too often, consider replacing it withabuseinfectioncorruptiondeterioration
pollution
 and congestion. For example
, If transportation vehicles run on solar You use this word too often, consider replacing it withstrengthtoughnesspowervitalitystaminaefficiency
energy
, it would be cheaper. It also
 contributes You use this word too often, consider replacing it withfewer
less
 carbon dioxide emission to the environment. By way of illustration, You use this word too often, consider replacing it withgustairgalebreezecycloneblast
wind
You use this word too often, consider replacing it withstrengthtoughnesspowervitalitystaminaefficiency
energy
 is renewable and it is also
 a source of clean, non-polluting, electricity. According to research, the You use this word too often, consider replacing it withlandpeopleregioncommunitysocietystate
countries
 using You use this word too often, consider replacing it withgustairgalebreezecycloneblast
wind
You use this word too often, consider replacing it withstrengthtoughnesspowervitalitystaminaefficiency
energy
 have You use this word too often, consider replacing it withfewer
less
 gas emissions and their air quality is better than those not using You use this word too often, consider replacing it withgustairgalebreezecycloneblast
wind
 energy.

In conclusion
, we can say it is not the best solution to increase the You use this word too often, consider replacing it withfarepayfeepremiumfigurevaluation
price
 of fuel for You use this word too often, consider replacing it withfewer
less
You use this word too often, consider replacing it withtransportationshipmentservicetravelinfluxgridlock
traffic
 and You use this word too often, consider replacing it withfewer
less
You use this word too often, consider replacing it withabuseinfectioncorruptiondeterioration
pollution
. Thus
, it can be highly
 recommended that the best way of decreasing You use this word too often, consider replacing it withabuseinfectioncorruptiondeterioration
pollution
 and You use this word too often, consider replacing it withtransportationshipmentservicetravelinfluxgridlock
traffic
 is to This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :exploit
use
 sustainable You use this word too often, consider replacing it withstrengthtoughnesspowervitalitystaminaefficiency
energy
. In addition
, we should be aware that there is This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:merely
just
 one world. 