Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.
Check Your Text it's free

Increasing the price of petrol is the best way to solve growing traffic and pollution problems. To what extends do you agree or disagree? What other measures do you think might be effective?

Increasing the price of petrol is the best way to solve growing traffic and pollution problems. What other measures do you think might be effective? aD6V
Traffic and pollution have been two major issues around the world. It is believed that increasing the price of petrol is the best solution. It is my firm belief that increasing the petrol price doesn’t have an effect on cutting down pollution. However, countries can find some alternative energy sources in order to tackle these ongoing two problems. On the one hand, there are people who think that increasing the price of petrol will reduce its use thus, decreasing traffic congestion and pollution. It is pointed out that raising the petrol price is a short term measure and there is no effect on pollution. Whereas the number of cars has decreased on roads, it largely affects prices of food and other goods, too. For instance, in my country, Turkey, everything depends on each other like a chain. It means that the higher the price of fuel is, the higher the price on food is. This leads to inflation in poor countries. As a result of this, people have to survive to buy even a slice of bread with their wage. On the other hand, governments can use sustainable resources like solar energy and wind power. It can provide multiple solutions for both pollution and congestion. For example, If transportation vehicles run on solar energy, it would be cheaper. It also contributes less carbon dioxide emission to the environment. By way of illustration, wind energy is renewable and it is also a source of clean, non-polluting, electricity. According to research, the countries using wind energy have less gas emissions and their air quality is better than those not using wind energy. In conclusion, we can say it is not the best solution to increase the price of fuel for less traffic and less pollution. Thus, it can be highly recommended that the best way of decreasing pollution and traffic is to use sustainable energy. In addition, we should be aware that there is just one world.
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
Traffic
and
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
pollution
have been two major issues around the world. It
is believed
that increasing the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
price
of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
petrol
is the best solution. It is my firm belief that increasing the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
petrol
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
price
doesn’t have an effect on cutting down
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
pollution
.
However
,
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
countries
can find
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
some
alternative
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
energy
sources in order to tackle these ongoing two problems.

On the one hand, there are
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
people
who
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
think
that increasing the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
price
of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
petrol
will
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
reduce
its
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
use
thus
, decreasing
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
traffic
congestion and
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
pollution
. It
is pointed
out that raising the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
petrol
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
price
is a short term measure and there is no effect on
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
pollution
. Whereas the number of cars has decreased on roads, it
largely
affects
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
prices
of food and other
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
goods
, too.
For instance
, in my
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
country
, Turkey, everything depends on each other like a chain. It means that the higher the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
price
of fuel is, the higher the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
price
on food is. This leads to inflation in poor
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
countries
.
As a result
of this,
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
people
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
have to
survive to
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
buy
even a slice of bread with their wage.

On the other hand
,
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
governments
can
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
use
sustainable resources like solar
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
energy
and
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
wind
power. It can provide multiple solutions for both
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
pollution
and congestion.
For example
, If transportation vehicles run on solar
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
energy
, it would be cheaper. It
also
contributes
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
less
carbon dioxide emission to the environment. By way of illustration,
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
wind
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
energy
is renewable and it is
also
a source of clean, non-polluting, electricity. According to research, the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
countries
using
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
wind
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
energy
have
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
less
gas emissions and their air quality is better than those not using
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
wind
energy.

In conclusion
, we can say it is not the best solution to increase the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
price
of fuel for
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
less
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
traffic
and
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
less
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
pollution
.
Thus
, it can be
highly
recommended that the best way of decreasing
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
pollution
and
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
traffic
is to
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
use
sustainable
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
energy
.
In addition
, we should be aware that there is
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
just
one world.
What do you think?
  • This is funny writingFunny
  • I love this writingLove
  • This writing has blown my mindWow
  • It made me angryAngry
  • It made me sadSad

IELTS essay Increasing the price of petrol is the best way to solve growing traffic and pollution problems. What other measures do you think might be effective?

Essay
  American English
4 paragraphs
325 words
6.0
Overall Band Score
Coherence and Cohesion: 5.5
  • Structure your answers in logical paragraphs
  • ?
    One main idea per paragraph
  • Include an introduction and conclusion
  • Support main points with an explanation and then an example
  • Use cohesive linking words accurately and appropriately
  • Vary your linking phrases using synonyms
Lexical Resource: 5.5
  • Try to vary your vocabulary using accurate synonyms
  • Use less common question specific words that accurately convey meaning
  • Check your work for spelling and word formation mistakes
Grammatical Range: 6.5
  • Use a variety of complex and simple sentences
  • Check your writing for errors
Task Achievement: 7.0
  • Answer all parts of the question
  • ?
    Present relevant ideas
  • Fully explain these ideas
  • Support ideas with relevant, specific examples
Labels Descriptions
  • ?
    Currently is not available
  • Meet the criteria
  • Doesn't meet the criteria
Recent posts





Get more results for topic:
  • Increasing the price of petrol is the best way to solve growing traffic and pollution problems. To what extends do you agree or disagree? What other measures do you think might be effective?