Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.
Check Your Text it's free

In the modern world, the rate of pollution is increasing.It is suggested that, ownership of cars should be restricted to one per family to reduce air pollution and traffic congestion. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

In the modern world, the rate of pollution is increasing. It is suggested that, ownership of cars should be restricted to one per family to reduce air pollution and traffic congestion. qV0mw
With the boost in the pollution on earth, there is an upsurge in the use of private vehicles. It is advice that to control air pollution and traffic jam the only one car per family should be allowed. I completely disagree to this statement as there are more effective alternative to bring a solution. To embark with, the suggestions to support my ideology, firstly, such restriction will not only force people to compromise on their standard of living but also may lead to increase consumption of fuel, keeping the problem of air pollution intact instead, government should promote public transport -buses- and railway - by bringing more innovation, frequency, punctuality and quality as a by - product, there will be economic growth. secondly, by encouraging the carpool and odd-even driving method there will be a solution to both air pollution and traffic congestion. Additionally, wider roads, over bridges, underpass and multi -storey parking will redress. The woe of road blockage due to excessive use of vehicles. Considering, proactive measures to reverse air pollution, first and foremost, alternatives to fossil fuel should be researched upon. For example electric hydro, solar and bio-diesel operated auto mobiles will aid to bring a change simultaneously, initatives like reforestation and regular health check- up of vehicles will also serve the cause. on the close scrutiny, i conclude that it is not an efficient way to restrict vehicles as another alternatives might better health to curb air pollution and traffic congestion.
With the boost in the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
pollution
on earth, there is an upsurge in the
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
use
of private vehicles. It is advice that to control
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
air
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
pollution
and traffic jam the
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
only
one car per family should be
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
allowed
. I completely disagree to this statement as there are more effective
Possible agreement error. Did you mean "alternatives"?
alternative
to bring a solution.

To embark with, the suggestions to support my ideology,
firstly
, such restriction will not
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
only
force
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
people
to compromise on their standard of living
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
but
also
may lead to increase consumption of fuel, keeping the problem of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
air
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
pollution
intact
instead
,
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
government
should promote public transport -buses- and railway
Consider using an m-dash if you do not want to join two words.
-
by bringing more innovation, frequency, punctuality and quality as a by
Consider using an m-dash if you do not want to join two words.
-
product, there will be economic growth.

This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
secondly
, by encouraging the carpool and odd-even driving method there will be a solution to both
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
air
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
pollution
and traffic congestion.
Additionally
, wider roads, over bridges, underpass and multi
Possible spelling mistake found.
-storey
parking will redress. The woe of road blockage due to excessive
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
use
of vehicles.

Considering, proactive measures to reverse
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
air
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
pollution
,
first
and foremost, alternatives to fossil fuel should
be researched
upon.
For example
electric hydro, solar and bio-diesel operated auto mobiles will aid to bring a
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
change
simultaneously
,
Possible spelling mistake found.
initatives
like reforestation and regular health
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
check
- up of vehicles will
also
serve the cause.

This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
on
the
Consider using "scrutiny".
close scrutiny
,
Is this the personal pronoun "I"? It is spelled uppercase.
i
conclude that it is not an efficient way to restrict vehicles as another alternatives might better health to curb
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
air
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
pollution
and traffic congestion.
What do you think?
  • This is funny writingFunny
  • I love this writingLove
  • This writing has blown my mindWow
  • It made me angryAngry
  • It made me sadSad

IELTS essay In the modern world, the rate of pollution is increasing. It is suggested that, ownership of cars should be restricted to one per family to reduce air pollution and traffic congestion.

Essay
  American English
5 paragraphs
245 words
This writing has been penalized,
text can't be
less than 250 words in Task 2
and less than 150 words in Task 1
5.0
Overall Band Score
Coherence and Cohesion: 5.5
  • Structure your answers in logical paragraphs
  • ?
    One main idea per paragraph
  • Include an introduction and conclusion
  • Support main points with an explanation and then an example
  • Use cohesive linking words accurately and appropriately
  • Vary your linking phrases using synonyms
Lexical Resource: 5.0
  • Try to vary your vocabulary using accurate synonyms
  • Use less common question specific words that accurately convey meaning
  • Check your work for spelling and word formation mistakes
Grammatical Range: 6.0
  • Use a variety of complex and simple sentences
  • Check your writing for errors
Task Achievement: 6.0
  • Answer all parts of the question
  • ?
    Present relevant ideas
  • Fully explain these ideas
  • Support ideas with relevant, specific examples
Labels Descriptions
  • ?
    Currently is not available
  • Meet the criteria
  • Doesn't meet the criteria
Recent posts





Get more results for topic:
  • In the modern world, the rate of pollution is increasing.It is suggested that, ownership of cars should be restricted to one per family to reduce air pollution and traffic congestion. To what extent do you agree or disagree?