A person with Covid-19 should be considered a case of re-infection if they had a previous bout at least 102 days prior to their latest test result, and had at least one negative test in the period between, the Indian Council of Medical Research (ICMR) suggested after studying the case of 1, 300 people, 4. 5% of whom appeared to have caught the virus twice.
Published online by the Cambirdge Epidemiology and Infection journal as an accepted manuscript, the study is based on telephone interviews with people selected from ICMR’s laboratory database of at least 80 million individuals tested during January 22 to October 7, 2020. The government has been working on a definition for ‘re-infection’ of cases since October.
The 4. 5% who were found infected were people infected in the first wave. “This is an averaged out figure over a period of about eight months— January to October, 2020—, which will vary with behaviour and intensity of epidemic, ” said Dr Balram Bhargava, director general, ICMR.
According to the study, the authors said: “Taking available evidence into consideration, re-infection with Sars-CoV-2 in our study was defined as any individual who tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 on two separate occasions by either molecular tests or rapid antigen test at an interval of at least 102 days with one negative molecular test in between. In this archive based, telephonic survey, 58 out of 1, 300 individuals (4. 5%) fulfilled the above mentioned definition”.
The study, the authors added, was meant to “develop an epidemiological case definition of possible Sars-CoV-2 re-infection and assess its magnitude in India. . . While Sars-CoV-2 re-infection is still a rare phenomenon, there is a need for epidemiological definition of re-infection for establishing surveillance systems and this study contributes to such goal. . , ” the paper said.
A person with Covid-19 should
be considered
a case of re-infection if they had a previous bout at least 102 days prior to their latest
test
result, and had at least one
negative
test
in the period between, the Indian Council of Medical Research (
ICMR
) suggested after studying the case of 1, 300
people
, 4. 5% of whom appeared to have caught the virus twice.
Published online by the
Cambirdge
Epidemiology and Infection journal as an
accepted
manuscript, the
study
is based
on telephone interviews with
people
selected from
ICMR
’s laboratory database of at least 80 million individuals
tested
during January 22 to October 7, 2020. The
government
has been working on a definition for ‘re-infection’ of cases since October.
The 4. 5% who
were found
infected
were
people
infected in the
first
wave. “This is an averaged out figure over a period of about eight months— January to
October, 2020
—, which will vary with
behaviour
and intensity of epidemic,
”
said Dr
Balram
Bhargava
, director general,
ICMR
.
According to the
study
, the authors said: “Taking available evidence into consideration, re-infection with Sars-CoV-2 in our
study
was defined
as any individual who
tested
positive
for SARS-CoV-2 on two separate occasions by either molecular
tests
or rapid antigen
test
at an interval of at least 102 days with one
negative
molecular
test
in between. In this archive based, telephonic survey, 58 out of 1, 300 individuals (4. 5%) fulfilled the above mentioned definition”.
The
study
, the authors
added
,
was meant
to “develop an epidemiological case definition of possible Sars-CoV-2 re-infection and assess its magnitude in India.
.
.
While Sars-CoV-2 re-infection is
still
a rare phenomenon, there is a need for epidemiological definition of re-infection for establishing surveillance systems and this
study
contributes to such goal.
.
,
”
the paper said.