In the given set of materials, the reading passage discusses three different methods to prevent nutria from spreading, while the lecture counters each argument made by the passage.

In the given set of materials, the reading passage discusses three different methods to prevent nutria from spreading, while the lecture counters each argument made by the passage. First, the passage suggests using fences and walls made from solid materials, such as metal to prevent damages to private property. These fences are also preferable in terms of cost as they do not need extra maintenance fees. However, the lecturer claims that this method is not effective by mentioning nutria’s sharp-clawed feet. Nutrias are infamous for their digging abilities with their feet, thus, the hardness of fences and walls become meaningless. They can always dig underground to enter private territories no matter how deep the fences are installed. Second, the passage proposes drying up the drainages to block nutria from making them their habitat. Since nutrias are attracted to place with water, removing water from drainages would help to get rid of nutrias. However, the lecturer dissents this claim by explaining that it is too much of an extreme solution. Drying the drainage removes water needed for crops to grow. Moreover, people do not use water only for farming. Consequently, doing so will negatively affect people’s livelihood. Lastly, the passage presents an idea of cooking nutrias for food as nutria are tender and contain a lot of nutrients. However, the lecturer goes against this claim by mentioning that nutrias are a host of bacteria and parasites. They are known to carry pathogens that cause dramatic diseases like tuberculosis. Some may even be infected with parasites that cause adverse effects on the human body. Therefore, consuming nutrias is not an option. In conclusion, while the reading passage states three different ways to get rid of nutrias, the lecture opposes each of them using its reasons and evidence.