It is undeniable that reading sources such as books, newspapers, magazines, etc. , are spread over the Internet in the way that has made it much more convenient for us to use them. However, there are a number of benefits of printed books as well.
In terms of electrical reading sources, they are way more accessible than physical books are, which makes it true that people have high potential to start reading more online in the future. Nevertheless, I believe that this will tend to be applied to when they are reading rather short contexts like magazines, articles and so on. In contrast, when it comes to books, most of them take some time to finish. This possibly shows that there’s a high possibility of them quitting reading it and turning it off, or using other applications before they even finish the book, once they get bored in the middle of reading it.
Conversely, physical reading sources tend not to have distractions like electrical devices do. According to this, printed books can be a lot more effective in concentrating for those who enjoy reading books, as long as they provide themselves a quiet environment to focus. Furthermore, some printed books are so worthwhile that they can be rare to find online for free. Despite numerous books being revealed via the Internet without payment requirement, I doubt that every book that they seek will be so. Although it’s inevitable that the Internet has a host of benefits with regard to reading, the positives of physical books should never be overlooked.
In conclusion, I agree that people will start reading more via the Internet rather than through physical sources. However, in my opinion, it is inevitable that electrical newspapers, books or magazines cannot replace the special advantages of printed ones. Thus, I strongly disagree with the statement that no one will buy physical books or newspapers in the years to come.
It is undeniable that
reading
sources
such as
books
, newspapers, magazines, etc.
,
are spread
over the Internet in the way that has made it much more convenient for us to
use
them.
However
, there are a number of benefits of
printed
books
as well
.
In terms of electrical
reading
sources
, they are way more accessible than
physical
books
are, which
makes
it true that
people
have high potential to
start
reading
more online in the future.
Nevertheless
, I believe that this will tend to
be applied
to when they are
reading
rather
short contexts like magazines, articles and
so
on.
In contrast
, when it
comes
to
books
, most of them take
some
time to finish. This
possibly
shows
that there’s a high possibility of them quitting
reading
it and turning it off, or using other applications
before
they even finish the
book
, once they
get
bored in the middle of
reading
it.
Conversely
,
physical
reading
sources
tend not to have distractions like electrical devices do. According to this,
printed
books
can be a lot more effective in concentrating for those who enjoy
reading
books
, as long as they provide themselves a quiet environment to focus.
Furthermore
,
some
printed
books
are
so
worthwhile that they can be rare to find online for free. Despite numerous
books
being revealed
via the Internet without payment requirement, I doubt that every
book
that they seek will be
so
. Although it’s inevitable that the Internet has a host of benefits with regard to
reading
, the positives of
physical
books
should never
be overlooked
.
In conclusion
, I
agree
that
people
will
start
reading
more via the Internet
rather
than through
physical
sources
.
However
, in my opinion, it is inevitable that electrical newspapers,
books
or magazines cannot replace the special advantages of
printed
ones.
Thus
, I
strongly
disagree with the statement that no one will
buy
physical
books
or newspapers in the years to
come
.