Nowadays, it is commonly witnessed that urban areas are becoming larger and congested due to mass migration of people from rural areas. Outcome of this migration is strain placed on infrastructure in cities. It is believed that these alterations have had some positive influences. However, I personally think that their drawbacks will become far influential.
On the first side, migration of rural residents into cities, has had two important advantages on infrastructures. One is that constructions have been more developed. To build more high-rise buildings, construction developers have invested more in cities than the rural areas, leading citizens to access to stronger residential premises in urban areas. Furthermore, transportation has been improved dramatically. Governments have had to provide more bus or train as more people have moved from suburbs to cities
On the other hand, I personally believe that it could be like a tip of an iceberg if we only consider the positive side, and the negative side should be figured out. One reason behind it is that more agricultural lands will be degraded. Clearly, the more buildings are built, the more farmlands vegetations and woods will be ruined. The soil will be eroded. If this method continues, more farmlands will be destroyed.
Thus, to conclude the discussion, it can be finally said that, although urbanization might have had some advantages on some important infrastructures of cities, its drawbacks should not be forgotten. From my point of view, if this pattern continues, more freshwater resources and farmlands will be demolished.
Nowadays, it is
commonly
witnessed that urban
areas
are becoming larger and congested due to mass migration of
people
from rural
areas
. Outcome of this migration is strain placed on infrastructure in
cities
. It
is believed
that these alterations have had
some
positive
influences.
However
, I
personally
think
that their drawbacks will become far influential.
On the
first
side, migration of rural residents into
cities
, has had two
important
advantages on infrastructures. One is that constructions have been more developed. To build more high-rise buildings, construction developers have invested more in
cities
than the rural
areas
, leading citizens to access to stronger residential premises in urban
areas
.
Furthermore
, transportation has been
improved
dramatically
.
Governments
have had to provide more bus or train as more
people
have
moved
from suburbs to cities
On the other hand
, I
personally
believe that it could be like a tip of an iceberg if we
only
consider the
positive
side, and the
negative
side should
be figured
out. One reason behind it is that more agricultural lands will
be degraded
.
Clearly
, the more buildings
are built
, the more farmlands
vegetations
and woods will
be ruined
. The soil will
be eroded
. If this method continues, more farmlands will be
destroyed
.
Thus
,
to conclude
the discussion, it can be
finally
said that, although urbanization might have had
some
advantages on
some
important
infrastructures of
cities
, its drawbacks should not
be forgotten
. From my point of view, if this pattern continues, more freshwater resources and farmlands will
be demolished
.