Every nation has their different tradition and norms. Similarly, aged people get high respect in some cultures, while in others youngsters are considered more valued. In this essay, I will discuss both the perspectives and then form my opinion.
Proponents of first view-point contend that old people have more experience and wise knowledge as they have come accrosse many situation throughout their life. World can get great benefit from their experience. So, due to huge knowledge and precious experience they get more respect in society. Moreover, they claim that grown ones also sacrifice their whole life to offer better life to their offsprings. They have done lot of hard work to make their children's future bright. Consequently, they do not get high respect, they earn it through their hardships for their new coming generations. Advocates of second view-point keep up that youngsters are back-bone of a nation, they are the future of nation. They will become the future doctors, teachers, engineers and will contribute in the development of nation. As the development of nation is fully dependent on its youth, as a result they get more respect. Furthermore, they argued that youngsters also have adapted with technology in far better way, where old ones are still grappling to learn fundamental use of technology. So, they have a notion that old people have served enough as they can and now all the spotlight should be on the youngsters because they are the coming future of nation.
In my opinion, old population get huge respect in society owing to their wise wisdom and better eyesight. They also make world better place to live for their coming generations. Whereas youngsters are considered future of a nation with strength to adapt with new technology that is why they are more valued in some cultures. I think that, the respect of different age groups is different according to the mindset and expectations towards them by society.
Every
nation
has their
different
tradition and norms.
Similarly
, aged
people
get
high
respect
in
some
cultures, while in others youngsters
are considered
more valued. In this essay, I will discuss both the perspectives and then form my opinion.
Proponents of
first
view-point contend that
old
people
have more experience and wise knowledge as they have
come
accrosse
many
situation throughout their life. World can
get
great benefit from their experience.
So
, due to huge knowledge and precious experience they
get
more
respect
in society.
Moreover
, they claim that grown
ones
also
sacrifice their whole life to offer
better
life to their offsprings. They have done lot of
hard
work to
make
their children's
future
bright.
Consequently
, they do not
get
high
respect
, they earn it through their hardships for their new coming generations. Advocates of second view-point
keep
up that youngsters are back-bone of a
nation
, they are the
future
of
nation
. They will become the
future
doctors, teachers, engineers and will contribute in the development of
nation
. As the development of
nation
is
fully
dependent on its youth,
as a result
they
get
more
respect
.
Furthermore
, they argued that youngsters
also
have adapted with technology in far
better
way, where
old
ones
are
still
grappling to learn fundamental
use
of technology.
So
, they have a notion that
old
people
have served
enough
as they can and
now
all the spotlight should be on the youngsters
because
they are the coming
future
of nation.
In my opinion,
old
population
get
huge
respect
in society owing to their wise wisdom and
better
eyesight. They
also
make
world
better
place to
live
for their coming generations. Whereas youngsters
are considered
future
of a
nation
with strength to adapt with new technology
that is
why they are more valued in
some
cultures. I
think
that, the
respect
of
different
age groups is
different
according to the mindset and expectations towards them by society.