Changing needs of TV viewers have caused many media companies to broadcast criminal trials. In my opinion, this does more harm than good.
On the one hand, there are two basic reasons why people might take advantage of watching these TV programs. In the first place, it familiarizes them with the law and legal procedures. Some people may not have an idea of what, in fact, is a trial and how it is held. So, by watching these trials, they experience how fair judgments are made based on eyewitnesses' convictions and law principles. Younger viewers can also learn moral lessons about the negative consequences of committing a crime. Seeing a murderer, for instance, being charged for, say, 30 years of prison is likely to deter youngsters from offences.
However, I believe that the decided negatives of this outweigh the advantages. The main reason for this is ethical. Media companies have no right to reveal people's personal lives without their own permission. It is unlikely that criminals are asked for a permission to be shown on the television because they are offenders and have little right to object. This revelation is, perhaps, the violation of human rights. Last but not least, minor details of crime, which are often disclosed during trials, can be a valuable source of information for other criminals; in other words, once they watch them, they tend not to repeat mistakes previously made in their further actions.
In conclusion, I think that the disadvantages of watching criminal trials on the TV, ethical considerations and grounds for further crime, are far greater than the advantages.
Changing needs of TV viewers have caused
many
media
companies
to broadcast
criminal
trials
. In my opinion, this does more harm than
good
.
On the one hand, there are two basic reasons why
people
might take advantage of watching these TV programs. In the
first
place, it familiarizes them with the law and legal procedures.
Some
people
may not have an
idea
of what, in fact, is a
trial
and how it
is held
.
So
, by watching these
trials
, they experience how
fair
judgments
are made
based on eyewitnesses' convictions and law principles. Younger viewers can
also
learn moral lessons about the
negative
consequences of committing a crime. Seeing a murderer,
for instance
,
being charged
for, say, 30 years of prison is likely to deter youngsters from
offences
.
However
, I believe that the decided negatives of this outweigh the advantages. The main reason for this is ethical. Media
companies
have no right to reveal
people
's personal
lives
without their
own
permission. It is unlikely that
criminals
are
asked for
a permission to
be shown
on the television
because
they are offenders and have
little
right to object. This revelation is, perhaps, the violation of human rights. Last
but
not least, minor
details
of crime, which are
often
disclosed during
trials
, can be a valuable source of information for other
criminals
;
in other words
, once they
watch
them, they tend not to repeat mistakes previously made in their
further
actions.
In conclusion
, I
think
that the disadvantages of watching
criminal
trials
on the TV, ethical considerations and grounds for
further
crime, are far greater than the advantages.