Search
Vocabularying
Listening
Reading
1. Academic
2. General
Writing
1. IELTSWriting Checker
2. IELTS Writing Samples
Speaking

Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.

In some countries owning a home rather than renting one is considered very important. Why might this be the case? Is this a positive or negative development?

Every country might have different views of home owning and renting as some countries, people might prioritize owning a house rather than renting the house. In my opinion, this is a negative situation as most of the people would want to have their own house and there would be land issues, energy issues, and environmental issues. To begin, people prefer having their own house as they do not have to worry about the financial issues and the risk when natural incidents strike. When people rent houses, they have to manage their financials well to be able to afford the rent or else they will face the risk of not having place to live, and this is the reason for almost everyone who prefer owning house as they seek for security in their life; they want to be certain on something, so that they can focus on other issues. Also, when natural incidents occur, the damaged property will be gone, and tenants would not have their own actual property which leads to the mentioned word of security seeking. However, those risks would be decreased when people owned the house as they will have actual property to be used in the future like businesses or for mortgages. Owning a house also has impacts as more people demand for houses meaning that there would be a surge in land usage which would decrease the land for other uses for an increase in residential area. The land for other usage might be more efficient than to be used as a residential area, so building more and more houses might reduce the opportunity from that piece of land. Consequently, more houses means more energy usage as each house would have their own utilities unlike rental houses that you can share with others to reduce the use of energy. For example, having one fridge per house uses a lot of energy, but if many people use that fridge, the energy usage per person would be reduced. From all those issues, it can be linked to the last issue as well as more land and energy usage from an increasing number of houses would have an impact on the environment as deforestation would have to increase to clear more land for houses affecting on the animals and their habitats. Moreover, energy usage can damage the environment as it can speed up global warming from electronic devices or appliances usage which release harmful gases into the atmosphere. Harmful substances in the air would worsen pollution issues which come back to us, people, as health related issues concerning lung and respiratory systems. In conclusion, owning a home has benefits in terms of security in life and property but it causes more detrimental effects such as deforestation, pollution, and environment harming from creating pieces of land for houses which outweighs its benefits in the long term.

Every country You use this word too often, consider replacing it withpotencyefficacyvalor
might
 have This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:various
different
 views of home You use this word too often, consider replacing it withcontrolenjoydominateboastkeepoccupy
owning
 and renting as This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:a number of
some
 countries, You use this word too often, consider replacing it withcrowdfamilycommunitynationsocietypublic
people
You use this word too often, consider replacing it withpotencyefficacyvalor
might
 prioritize You use this word too often, consider replacing it withcontrolenjoydominateboastkeepoccupy
owning
 a You use this word too often, consider replacing it withbuildingboxapartmentdwellingresidenceshack
house
rather
 than renting the You use this word too often, consider replacing it withbuildingboxapartmentdwellingresidenceshack
house
. In my opinion, this is a This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:adverse
negative
 situation as most of the You use this word too often, consider replacing it withcrowdfamilycommunitynationsocietypublic
people
 would want to have their This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :possess
own
You use this word too often, consider replacing it withbuildingboxapartmentdwellingresidenceshack
house
 and there would be You use this word too often, consider replacing it withestatesoilterrainhomeearthcontinent
land
You use this word too often, consider replacing it withaffairpointquestionargumentcontroversytopic
issues
, You use this word too often, consider replacing it withstrengthtoughnesspowervitalitystaminaefficiency
energy
You use this word too often, consider replacing it withaffairpointquestionargumentcontroversytopic
issues
, and environmental issues.

To This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :initiatecommence
begin
, You use this word too often, consider replacing it withcrowdfamilycommunitynationsocietypublic
people
 prefer having their This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :possess
own
You use this word too often, consider replacing it withbuildingboxapartmentdwellingresidenceshack
house
 as they do not This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:ought to
have to
 worry about the financial You use this word too often, consider replacing it withaffairpointquestionargumentcontroversytopic
issues
 and the This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :hazarddanger
risk
 when natural incidents strike. When You use this word too often, consider replacing it withcrowdfamilycommunitynationsocietypublic
people
 rent You use this word too often, consider replacing it withbuildingboxapartmentdwellingresidenceshack
houses
, they This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:ought to
have to
 manage their financials well to be able to afford the rent or else they will face the This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :hazarddanger
risk
 of not having place to This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :reside
live
, and this is the reason for almost everyone who prefer You use this word too often, consider replacing it withcontrolenjoydominateboastkeepoccupy
owning
You use this word too often, consider replacing it withbuildingboxapartmentdwellingresidenceshack
house
 as they seek for security in their life; they want to be certain on something, This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:consequently
so
 that they can focus on You use this word too often, consider replacing it withnewalternativemore
other
You use this word too often, consider replacing it withaffairpointquestionargumentcontroversytopic
issues
. Also
, when natural incidents occur, the damaged You use this word too often, consider replacing it withplotlandwealthestatefarmhouse
property
 will be gone
, and tenants would not have their This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :possess
own
 actual You use this word too often, consider replacing it withplotlandwealthestatefarmhouse
property
 which leads to the mentioned word of security seeking.

However
, those This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :hazardsdangers
risks
 would be decreased
 when You use this word too often, consider replacing it withcrowdfamilycommunitynationsocietypublic
people
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :possessed
owned
 the You use this word too often, consider replacing it withbuildingboxapartmentdwellingresidenceshack
house
 as they will have actual You use this word too often, consider replacing it withplotlandwealthestatefarmhouse
property
 to be This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :exploited
used
 in the future like businesses or for mortgages. You use this word too often, consider replacing it withcontrolenjoydominateboastkeepoccupy
Owning
 a You use this word too often, consider replacing it withbuildingboxapartmentdwellingresidenceshack
house
also
 has impacts as more You use this word too often, consider replacing it withcrowdfamilycommunitynationsocietypublic
people
 demand for You use this word too often, consider replacing it withbuildingboxapartmentdwellingresidenceshack
houses
 meaning that there would be a surge in You use this word too often, consider replacing it withestatesoilterrainhomeearthcontinent
land
You use this word too often, consider replacing it withmanagement
usage
 which would decrease the You use this word too often, consider replacing it withestatesoilterrainhomeearthcontinent
land
 for You use this word too often, consider replacing it withnewalternativemore
other
You use this word too often, consider replacing it withhandlinghelpservicepracticevalueneed
uses
 for an increase in residential area. The You use this word too often, consider replacing it withestatesoilterrainhomeearthcontinent
land
 for You use this word too often, consider replacing it withnewalternativemore
other
You use this word too often, consider replacing it withmanagement
usage
You use this word too often, consider replacing it withpotencyefficacyvalor
might
 be more efficient than to be This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :exploited
used
 as a residential area, This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:consequently
so
 building more and more You use this word too often, consider replacing it withbuildingboxapartmentdwellingresidenceshack
houses
You use this word too often, consider replacing it withpotencyefficacyvalor
might
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :alleviate
reduce
 the opportunity from that piece of You use this word too often, consider replacing it withestatesoilterrainhomeearthcontinent
land
. Consequently
, more You use this word too often, consider replacing it withbuildingboxapartmentdwellingresidenceshack
houses
 means more You use this word too often, consider replacing it withstrengthtoughnesspowervitalitystaminaefficiency
energy
You use this word too often, consider replacing it withmanagement
usage
 as each You use this word too often, consider replacing it withbuildingboxapartmentdwellingresidenceshack
house
 would have their This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :possess
own
 utilities unlike rental You use this word too often, consider replacing it withbuildingboxapartmentdwellingresidenceshack
houses
 that you can share with others to This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :alleviate
reduce
 the You use this word too often, consider replacing it withhandlinghelpservicepracticevalueneed
use
 of You use this word too often, consider replacing it withstrengthtoughnesspowervitalitystaminaefficiency
energy
. For example
, having one fridge per You use this word too often, consider replacing it withbuildingboxapartmentdwellingresidenceshack
house
You use this word too often, consider replacing it withhandlinghelpservicepracticevalueneed
uses
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:a plethora ofa number ofnumerous
a lot of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it withstrengthtoughnesspowervitalitystaminaefficiency
energy
, This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:on the contrary
but
 if This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:a plethora ofa number ofnumerous
many
You use this word too often, consider replacing it withcrowdfamilycommunitynationsocietypublic
people
You use this word too often, consider replacing it withhandlinghelpservicepracticevalueneed
use
 that fridge, the You use this word too often, consider replacing it withstrengthtoughnesspowervitalitystaminaefficiency
energy
You use this word too often, consider replacing it withmanagement
usage
 per person would be This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :alleviated
reduced
.

From all those You use this word too often, consider replacing it withaffairpointquestionargumentcontroversytopic
issues
, it can be linked
 to the last You use this word too often, consider replacing it withaffairpointquestionargumentcontroversytopic
issue
as well
 as more You use this word too often, consider replacing it withestatesoilterrainhomeearthcontinent
land
 and You use this word too often, consider replacing it withstrengthtoughnesspowervitalitystaminaefficiency
energy
You use this word too often, consider replacing it withmanagement
usage
 from an increasing number of You use this word too often, consider replacing it withbuildingboxapartmentdwellingresidenceshack
houses
 would have an impact on the environment as deforestation would This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:ought to
have to
 increase to This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :apparent
clear
 more You use this word too often, consider replacing it withestatesoilterrainhomeearthcontinent
land
 for You use this word too often, consider replacing it withbuildingboxapartmentdwellingresidenceshack
houses
 affecting on the animals and their habitats. Moreover
, You use this word too often, consider replacing it withstrengthtoughnesspowervitalitystaminaefficiency
energy
You use this word too often, consider replacing it withmanagement
usage
 can damage the environment as it can This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :accelerate
speed up
 global warming from electronic devices or appliances You use this word too often, consider replacing it withmanagement
usage
 which release harmful gases into the atmosphere. Harmful substances in the air would worsen pollution You use this word too often, consider replacing it withaffairpointquestionargumentcontroversytopic
issues
 which This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :approacharrive
come
 back to us, You use this word too often, consider replacing it withcrowdfamilycommunitynationsocietypublic
people
, as health related You use this word too often, consider replacing it withaffairpointquestionargumentcontroversytopic
issues
 concerning lung and respiratory systems.

In conclusion
, You use this word too often, consider replacing it withcontrolenjoydominateboastkeepoccupy
owning
 a home has benefits in terms of security in life and You use this word too often, consider replacing it withplotlandwealthestatefarmhouse
property
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:on the contrary
but
 it causes more detrimental effects such as deforestation, pollution, and environment harming from creating pieces of You use this word too often, consider replacing it withestatesoilterrainhomeearthcontinent
land
 for You use this word too often, consider replacing it withbuildingboxapartmentdwellingresidenceshack
houses
 which outweighs its benefits in the long term. 