Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.
Check Your Text it's free

In Order To Solve Traffic Problems Governments Should Tax Private Car Owners Heavily?

In Order To Solve Traffic Problems Governments Should Tax Private Car Owners Heavily? LbMj1
Some people argue that o curb the ongoing traffic issues, governments must levy huge tax on private automobile owners and utilise their money to enhance the public transport services. I will discuss the benefits and drawbacks of this situation in the following paragraphs. The main benefit of taxing private car owners is that it will make car ownership less affordable to them and consequently they will buy fewer cars. Nowadays, it is common for many families to own three or four cars when just one would suffice. When new cars are taxed heavily, members of a family will choose the share the service of their only family car instead of buying a separate car for each member of the family. The obvious advantage of this development is that it will reduce the number of cars on the road and thus ease traffic congestion and improve air quality. As for the government, it can use the money collected from private car owners for improving public transportation. When the quality of private transport increases, more and more people will opt to use it. This, in turn, will further reduce the number of cars on the road and prevent traffic jams to a great extent. On the downside, when fewer people buy cars, it will reduce the profitability of car makers. As a result, they will have to lay off some of their employees. This will increase the unemployment rate and affect the economy. Also, when car companies go out of business, the government will not be able to collect much tax from them. In short, this move might reduce traffic congestion but its overall impact on the economy will be devastating. In addition, this measure will make cars unaffordable to middle and lower income families. In conclusion, increasing tax on private vehicles will certainly reduce traffic congestion to some extent and improve air quality; however, at the same time, it will make cars unaffordable to middle and lower income groups and thus further increase inequality in the society. Also, it will hurt the economy as it will cause many car makers to go out of business.
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
Some
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
people
argue that o curb the ongoing
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
traffic
issues,
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
governments
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
must
levy huge tax on
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
private
automobile owners and
Possible spelling mistake. 'utilise' is British English.
utilise
their money to enhance the public transport services. I will discuss the benefits and drawbacks of this situation in the following paragraphs.

The main benefit of taxing
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
private
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
car
owners is that it will
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
make
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
car
ownership less affordable to them and
consequently
they will
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
buy
fewer
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
cars
. Nowadays, it is common for
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
many
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
families
to
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
own
three or four
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
cars
when
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
just
one would suffice. When new
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
cars
are taxed
heavily
, members of a
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
family
will choose the share the service of their
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
only
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
family
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
car
instead
of buying a separate
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
car
for each member of the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
family
. The obvious advantage of this development is that it will
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
reduce
the number of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
cars
on the road and
thus
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
ease
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
traffic
congestion and
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
improve
air quality. As for the
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
government
, it can
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
use
the money collected from
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
private
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
car
owners for improving public transportation. When the quality of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
private
transport increases, more and more
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
people
will opt to
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
use
it. This, in turn, will
further
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
reduce
the number of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
cars
on the road and
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
prevent
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
traffic
jams to a great extent.

On the downside, when fewer
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
people
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
buy
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
cars
, it will
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
reduce
the profitability of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
car
makers.
As a result
, they will
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
have to
lay off
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
some
of their employees. This will increase the unemployment rate and affect the economy.
Also
, when
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
car
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
companies
go out of business, the
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
government
will not be able to collect much tax from them. In short, this
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
move
might
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
reduce
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
traffic
congestion
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
but
its
overall
impact on the economy will be devastating.
In addition
, this measure will
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
make
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
cars
unaffordable to middle and lower income families.

Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Consider rewording the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
In
conclusion, increasing tax on
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
private
vehicles will
certainly
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
reduce
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
traffic
congestion to
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
some
extent and
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
improve
air quality;
however
, at the same time, it will
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
make
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
cars
unaffordable to middle and lower income groups and
thus
further
increase inequality in the society.
Also
, it will hurt the economy as it will cause
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
many
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
car
makers to go out of business.
What do you think?
  • This is funny writingFunny
  • I love this writingLove
  • This writing has blown my mindWow
  • It made me angryAngry
  • It made me sadSad

IELTS essay In Order To Solve Traffic Problems Governments Should Tax Private Car Owners Heavily?

Essay
  American English
4 paragraphs
354 words
5.5
Overall Band Score
Coherence and Cohesion: 5.0
  • Structure your answers in logical paragraphs
  • ?
    One main idea per paragraph
  • Include an introduction and conclusion
  • Support main points with an explanation and then an example
  • Use cohesive linking words accurately and appropriately
  • Vary your linking phrases using synonyms
Lexical Resource: 5.5
  • Try to vary your vocabulary using accurate synonyms
  • Use less common question specific words that accurately convey meaning
  • Check your work for spelling and word formation mistakes
Grammatical Range: 6.5
  • Use a variety of complex and simple sentences
  • Check your writing for errors
Task Achievement: 5.5
  • Answer all parts of the question
  • ?
    Present relevant ideas
  • Fully explain these ideas
  • Support ideas with relevant, specific examples
Labels Descriptions
  • ?
    Currently is not available
  • Meet the criteria
  • Doesn't meet the criteria
Recent posts





Get more results for topic:
  • In Order To Solve Traffic Problems Governments Should Tax Private Car Owners Heavily?