Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.
Check Your Text it's free

In order to reduce pollution, some people think it's better to put a tax on companies which produce pollution.Others believe that there could be other solutions. Discuss both these views and give your opinion.

In order to reduce pollution, some people think it's better to put a tax on companies which produce pollution. Others believe that there could be other solutions. YB7am
In order to lower the rate of pollution, some people think that it's preferable to put a tax on companies which produce pollution but others believe that there could be other solutions. I believe in both options and will explain these points in the upcoming paragraphs. Firstly, some people have a thought that imposing huge taxes from the pollution creating factory is a good way to reduce the rate of pollution. Governments can use these taxes to create a fund or organization that could help implement pollution control measures such as effluent treatment plants, degrading rivers, cutting a huge amount of trees etcetera. Moreover, taxes will increase the price of goods in the market which will reduce consumption, and hence pollution will also decrease. For example, the government of Singapore has imposed heavy taxes on all manufacturing facilities and used these funds to clean rivers, install machines to absorb harmful gases in Singapore’s air. Thus a heavy tax on companies has played an important role in making Singapore a clean place to live. Next are the people who think there can be other ways than imposing taxes on the factories and companies which creates more pollution. There can be other several ways such as spreading social awareness through various private or public Ngo's or strong oversight on the industries which exploits nature or use paper and plastic this can be very efficient in reducing the degradation of nature and pollution. If people are more aware of the situation they will not purchase items that are harmful to the environment and nature. In conclusion, I believe that heavy tax on companies is not an effective way to reduce pollution since it translates to an increase in prices of goods which eventually harm the consumers. Governments should strictly regulate the polluting industries and make the public aware of pollution emitted by any product. This will not only make people more aware of their duty to protect their environment, but also make Earth a sustainable place to live.
In order to lower the rate of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
pollution
,
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
some
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
people
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
think
that it's preferable to put a
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
tax
on
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
companies
which produce
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
pollution
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
but
others believe that there could be
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
other
solutions. I believe in both options and will
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
explain
these points in the upcoming paragraphs.

Firstly
,
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
some
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
people
have a
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
thought
that imposing huge
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
taxes
from the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
pollution
creating factory is a
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
good
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
way
to
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
reduce
the rate of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
pollution
.
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
Governments
can
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
use
these
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
taxes
to create a fund or organization that could
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
help
implement
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
pollution
control measures such as effluent treatment plants, degrading rivers, cutting a huge amount of trees etcetera.
Moreover
,
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
taxes
will increase the price of
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
goods
in the market which will
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
reduce
consumption, and
hence
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
pollution
will
also
decrease.
For example
, the
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
government
of Singapore has imposed heavy
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
taxes
on all manufacturing facilities and
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
used
these funds to clean rivers, install machines to absorb harmful gases in Singapore’s air.
Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Thus
a heavy
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
tax
on
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
companies
has played an
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
important
role in making Singapore a clean place to
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
live
.

Next
are the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
people
who
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
think
there can be
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
other
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
ways
than imposing
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
taxes
on the factories and
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
companies
which creates more
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
pollution
. There can be
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
other
several
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
ways
such as spreading social awareness through various private or public
Possible spelling mistake found.
Ngo
's or strong oversight on the industries which exploits nature or
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
use
paper and plastic this can be
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
very
efficient in reducing the degradation of nature and
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
pollution
. If
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
people
are more aware of the situation they will not
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
purchase
items that are harmful to the environment and nature.

In conclusion
, I believe that heavy
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
tax
on
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
companies
is not an effective
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
way
to
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
reduce
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
pollution
since it translates to an increase in prices of
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
goods
which
eventually
harm the consumers.
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
Governments
should
strictly
regulate the polluting industries and
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
make
the public aware of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
pollution
emitted by any product. This will not
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
only
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
make
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
people
more aware of their duty to protect their environment,
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
but
also
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
make
Earth a sustainable place to
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
live
.
What do you think?
  • This is funny writingFunny
  • I love this writingLove
  • This writing has blown my mindWow
  • It made me angryAngry
  • It made me sadSad

IELTS essay In order to reduce pollution, some people think it's better to put a tax on companies which produce pollution. Others believe that there could be other solutions.

Essay
  American English
4 paragraphs
335 words
6.0
Overall Band Score
Coherence and Cohesion: 6.5
  • Structure your answers in logical paragraphs
  • ?
    One main idea per paragraph
  • Include an introduction and conclusion
  • Support main points with an explanation and then an example
  • Use cohesive linking words accurately and appropriately
  • Vary your linking phrases using synonyms
Lexical Resource: 5.5
  • Try to vary your vocabulary using accurate synonyms
  • Use less common question specific words that accurately convey meaning
  • Check your work for spelling and word formation mistakes
Grammatical Range: 6.0
  • Use a variety of complex and simple sentences
  • Check your writing for errors
Task Achievement: 6.5
  • Answer all parts of the question
  • ?
    Present relevant ideas
  • Fully explain these ideas
  • Support ideas with relevant, specific examples
Labels Descriptions
  • ?
    Currently is not available
  • Meet the criteria
  • Doesn't meet the criteria
Recent posts