There has been an ongoing debate where to build an inhabitant for the people in the metropolis as having no space left in the urban areas. However, some people perceive that this land is available in the rural areas only which must be utilized for the agricultural and forest. This essay will discuss my stance with supporting arguments in the below paragraphs.
To begin with, the predominant reason behind to salvage the rural areas is that these places are the home for the animals. If this will be used by mankind for their residential purpose, then both must pass from many challenges. Although, this living entity would be considered as a crucial part to manage the food chain; their numbers are declining. For example, Research conducted shows that in recent times, the number of zoos is rising due to the impact of the deforestation and there would be no space available for their living.
Furthermore, this area helps to control the damage provided by the pollution generated in the metropolis. The trees will help to reduce the temperature and expand the possibilities of the rain which would be helpful for the growth of the crop. Moreover, this area can be utilized for the cropping, which delivers the food to the citified area. This will be used to build new homes than this part would be passed far to the cities. As a result, it would raise the price due to the transportation. For instance, a person living in the mega-cities has expenses are increasing exorbitantly due to the daily need product prices were higher compared to the past such as vegetables, milk.
In conclusion, a home is the basic need of mankind. As per my opinion, the rural area which gives shelter to the animals and the place where we can grow our food. So, this would be saved otherwise it would create a detrimental effect on the food and the environment.
There has been an ongoing debate where to build an inhabitant for the
people
in the metropolis as having no space
left
in the urban
areas
.
However
,
some
people
perceive that this land is available in the rural
areas
only
which
must
be utilized
for the agricultural and forest. This essay will discuss my stance with supporting arguments in the below paragraphs.
To
begin
with, the predominant reason behind to salvage the rural
areas
is that these places are the home for the animals. If this will be
used
by mankind for their residential purpose, then both
must
pass from
many
challenges. Although, this living entity would
be considered
as a crucial part to manage the
food
chain; their numbers are declining.
For example
, Research conducted
shows
that in recent times, the number of zoos is rising due to the impact of the deforestation and there would be no space available for their living.
Furthermore
, this
area
helps
to control the damage provided by the pollution generated in the metropolis. The trees will
help
to
reduce
the temperature and expand the possibilities of the rain which would be helpful for the growth of the crop.
Moreover
, this
area
can
be utilized
for the cropping, which delivers the
food
to the citified
area
. This will be
used
to build new homes than this part would
be passed
far to the cities.
As a result
, it would raise the price due to the transportation.
For instance
, a person living in the mega-cities has expenses are increasing
exorbitantly
due to the daily need product prices were higher compared to the past such as vegetables, milk.
In conclusion
, a home is the basic need of mankind. As per my opinion, the rural
area
which gives shelter to the animals and the place where we can grow our
food
.
So
, this would
be saved
otherwise
it would create a detrimental effect on the
food
and the environment.