Search
Vocabularying
Listening
Reading
1. Academic
2. General
Writing
1. IELTSWriting Checker
2. IELTS Writing Samples
Speaking

Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.

In many places, new homes are needed, but the only space available for building them is in the countryside. Some people believe it is more important to protect the countryside and not to build new homes there. What is your opinion? v.49

It is undeniable that with the expansion of cities, new homes are required to accommodate the growing population. As a result of the geographical situation of the cities, the only possible location for this is the countryside. While some people argue that preserving the countryside is more significant than the construction of new residential buildings, I believe that providing new homes for people is also essential. There are several reasons why some people are against building new homes in the countryside. To begin with, most cities are already full of apartments, skyscrapers, office buildings, etc. and the only place where we can get away from the hustle and bustle of the cities and relax in the countryside. In addition, we have a responsibility towards the earth and the future generation. In order to build new houses, trees must be cut down and new roads need to be built which all result in the destruction of the environment. Nevertheless, I believe that the expansion of cities is inevitable and for that, we need to build new residential buildings in the suburbs. Otherwise, we would have to demolish the existing homes in cities and build even more high-rise buildings which would have a drastic effect on the traffic, safety, quality of life and so many other factors. Cities would become extremely over-crowded and eventually, governments would have no control over them. Furthermore, building new houses can be considerably more cost-efficient than destroying the existing buildings in cities and building multiple-storey apartments. In conclusion, although I totally understand the reason some people are in favor of protecting the countryside, I think the only solution for the growing population is to construct new houses on the outskirts of cities.

It is undeniable that with the expansion of You use this word too often, consider replacing it withmetropoliscentermunicipalitydowntownplacecapital
cities
, You use this word too often, consider replacing it withlatedifferentstate-of-the-artmodernunusualunfamiliar
new
You use this word too often, consider replacing it withhutdormitoryapartmentdwellingpalaceresort
homes
are required
 to accommodate the growing population. As a result
 of the geographical situation of the You use this word too often, consider replacing it withmetropoliscentermunicipalitydowntownplacecapital
cities
, the This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :exclusively
only
 possible location for this is the You use this word too often, consider replacing it withscenerylandterrainenvironmentsurroundingslandscape
countryside
. While This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:a number of
some
You use this word too often, consider replacing it withcrowdfamilycommunitynationsocietypublic
people
 argue that preserving the You use this word too often, consider replacing it withscenerylandterrainenvironmentsurroundingslandscape
countryside
 is more significant than the construction of You use this word too often, consider replacing it withlatedifferentstate-of-the-artmodernunusualunfamiliar
new
 residential You use this word too often, consider replacing it withhuthouseconstructionarchitecturehome
buildings
, I believe that providing You use this word too often, consider replacing it withlatedifferentstate-of-the-artmodernunusualunfamiliar
new
You use this word too often, consider replacing it withhutdormitoryapartmentdwellingpalaceresort
homes
 for You use this word too often, consider replacing it withcrowdfamilycommunitynationsocietypublic
people
If 'people' is plural here, don't use the third-person singular verb.amarearen
is
also
 essential.

There are several reasons why This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:a number of
some
You use this word too often, consider replacing it withcrowdfamilycommunitynationsocietypublic
people
 are against You use this word too often, consider replacing it withhuthouseconstructionarchitecturehome
building
You use this word too often, consider replacing it withlatedifferentstate-of-the-artmodernunusualunfamiliar
new
You use this word too often, consider replacing it withhutdormitoryapartmentdwellingpalaceresort
homes
 in the You use this word too often, consider replacing it withscenerylandterrainenvironmentsurroundingslandscape
countryside
. To This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :initiatecommence
begin
 with, most You use this word too often, consider replacing it withmetropoliscentermunicipalitydowntownplacecapital
cities
 are already full of apartments, skyscrapers, office You use this word too often, consider replacing it withhuthouseconstructionarchitecturehome
buildings
, etc. and the This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :exclusively
only
 place where we can This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :acquire
get
 away from the hustle and bustle of the You use this word too often, consider replacing it withmetropoliscentermunicipalitydowntownplacecapital
cities
 and relax in the You use this word too often, consider replacing it withscenerylandterrainenvironmentsurroundingslandscape
countryside
. In addition
, we have a responsibility towards the earth and the future generation. In order to build You use this word too often, consider replacing it withlatedifferentstate-of-the-artmodernunusualunfamiliar
new
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :residences
houses
, trees This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :require
must
 be This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :minimize
cut
 down and You use this word too often, consider replacing it withlatedifferentstate-of-the-artmodernunusualunfamiliar
new
 roads need to be built
 which all result in the destruction of the environment.

Nevertheless
, I believe that the expansion of You use this word too often, consider replacing it withmetropoliscentermunicipalitydowntownplacecapital
cities
 is inevitable and for that, we need to build You use this word too often, consider replacing it withlatedifferentstate-of-the-artmodernunusualunfamiliar
new
 residential You use this word too often, consider replacing it withhuthouseconstructionarchitecturehome
buildings
 in the suburbs. Otherwise
, we would This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:ought to
have to
 demolish the existing You use this word too often, consider replacing it withhutdormitoryapartmentdwellingpalaceresort
homes
 in You use this word too often, consider replacing it withmetropoliscentermunicipalitydowntownplacecapital
cities
 and build even more high-rise You use this word too often, consider replacing it withhuthouseconstructionarchitecturehome
buildings
 which would have a drastic effect on the traffic, safety, quality of life and This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:consequently
so
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:a plethora ofa number ofnumerous
many
 other factors. You use this word too often, consider replacing it withmetropoliscentermunicipalitydowntownplacecapital
Cities
 would become extremely
 over-crowded and eventually
, This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :national authoritiespublic authorities
governments
 would have no control over them. Furthermore
, You use this word too often, consider replacing it withhuthouseconstructionarchitecturehome
building
You use this word too often, consider replacing it withlatedifferentstate-of-the-artmodernunusualunfamiliar
new
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :residences
houses
 can be considerably
 more cost-efficient than destroying the existing You use this word too often, consider replacing it withhuthouseconstructionarchitecturehome
buildings
 in You use this word too often, consider replacing it withmetropoliscentermunicipalitydowntownplacecapital
cities
 and You use this word too often, consider replacing it withhuthouseconstructionarchitecturehome
building
Possible spelling mistake found.
multiple-storey
 apartments.

In conclusion
, although I totally
 understand the reason This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:a number of
some
You use this word too often, consider replacing it withcrowdfamilycommunitynationsocietypublic
people
 are in favor of protecting the You use this word too often, consider replacing it withscenerylandterrainenvironmentsurroundingslandscape
countryside
, I This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :reckonassumebelieveconsider
think
 the This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :exclusively
only
 solution for the growing population is to construct You use this word too often, consider replacing it withlatedifferentstate-of-the-artmodernunusualunfamiliar
new
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :residences
houses
 on the outskirts of You use this word too often, consider replacing it withmetropoliscentermunicipalitydowntownplacecapital
cities
. 