It is undeniable that with the expansion of cities, new homes are required to accommodate the growing population. As a result of the geographical situation of the cities, the only possible location for this is the countryside. While some people argue that preserving the countryside is more significant than the construction of new residential buildings, I believe that providing new homes for people is also essential.
There are several reasons why some people are against building new homes in the countryside. To begin with, most cities are already full of apartments, skyscrapers, office buildings, etc. and the only place where we can get away from the hustle and bustle of the cities and relax in the countryside. In addition, we have a responsibility towards the earth and the future generation. In order to build new houses, trees must be cut down and new roads need to be built which all result in the destruction of the environment.
Nevertheless, I believe that the expansion of cities is inevitable and for that, we need to build new residential buildings in the suburbs. Otherwise, we would have to demolish the existing homes in cities and build even more high-rise buildings which would have a drastic effect on the traffic, safety, quality of life and so many other factors. Cities would become extremely over-crowded and eventually, governments would have no control over them. Furthermore, building new houses can be considerably more cost-efficient than destroying the existing buildings in cities and building multiple-storey apartments.
In conclusion, although I totally understand the reason some people are in favor of protecting the countryside, I think the only solution for the growing population is to construct new houses on the outskirts of cities. 
It is undeniable that with the expansion of  
cities
,  
new
  homes
  are required
 to accommodate the growing population.  
As a result
 of the geographical situation of the  
cities
, the  
only
 possible location for this is the  
countryside
. While  
some
  people
 argue that preserving the  
countryside
 is more significant than the construction of  
new
 residential  
buildings
, I believe that providing  
new
  homes
 for  
people
  is
  also
 essential.
There are several reasons why  
some
  people
 are against  
building
  new
  homes
 in the  
countryside
. To  
begin
 with, most  
cities
 are already full of apartments, skyscrapers, office  
buildings
, etc. and the  
only
 place where we can  
get
 away from the hustle and bustle of the  
cities
 and relax in the  
countryside
.  
In addition
, we have a responsibility towards the earth and the future generation. In order to build  
new
  houses
, trees  
must
 be  
cut
 down and  
new
 roads need to  
be built
 which all result in the destruction of the environment. 
Nevertheless
, I believe that the expansion of  
cities
 is inevitable and for that, we need to build  
new
 residential  
buildings
 in the suburbs.  
Otherwise
, we would  
have to
 demolish the existing  
homes
 in  
cities
 and build even more high-rise  
buildings
 which would have a drastic effect on the traffic, safety, quality of life and  
so
  many
 other factors.  
Cities
 would become  
extremely
 over-crowded and  
eventually
,  
governments
 would have no control over them.  
Furthermore
,  
building
  new
  houses
 can be  
considerably
 more cost-efficient than destroying the existing  
buildings
 in  
cities
 and  
building
  multiple-storey
 apartments. 
In conclusion
, although I  
totally
 understand the reason  
some
  people
 are in favor of protecting the  
countryside
, I  
think
 the  
only
 solution for the growing population is to construct  
new
  houses
 on the outskirts of  
cities
.