Smoking has been banned in public places like parks, hospitals and restaurants in many nations, and it is a law that many people support. This essay also agrees with this initiative because it reduces the harmful effects of passive smoking and also encourages smokers to quit.
The primary reason why making it illegal to smoke in public makes sense is that it prevents people from developing diseases related to second-hand smoke. Passive smoking is something that non-smokers cannot avoid in the presence of a smoker, and it is just as dangerous to people’s health as smoking. A ban in public places limits this type of exposure. For example, after Ireland decided to ban smoking in all indoor workplaces, there was a significant decline in lung cancer and other lethal diseases among restaurant and pub workers, leading many other countries to adopt similar measures.
The second main reason why this ban is warranted is that it helps those addicted to cigarettes quit their habit. A law prohibiting smoking in public areas would force smokers to leave the company of everyone else if they want to have a cigarette. Most people dislike feeling ostracised, and this would provide excellent motivation to quit. For instance, social pressure brought about by smoking bans is often cited by ex-smokers as one of the reasons they gave up the habit.
In conclusion, this essay believes that making it against the law to smoke in public should be encouraged because it prevents innocent people from developing serious health conditions caused by passive smoking and reduces the number of smokers.
Smoking
has
been banned
in
public
places like parks, hospitals and restaurants in
many
nations, and it is a law that
many
people
support. This essay
also
agrees
with this initiative
because
it
reduces
the harmful effects of passive
smoking
and
also
encourages smokers to quit.
The primary reason why making it illegal to smoke in
public
makes
sense is that it
prevents
people
from developing diseases related to second-hand smoke. Passive
smoking
is something that non-smokers cannot avoid in the presence of a smoker, and it is
just
as
dangerous
to
people’s
health as
smoking
. A
ban
in
public
places limits this type of exposure.
For example
, after Ireland decided to
ban
smoking
in all indoor workplaces, there was a significant decline in lung cancer and other lethal diseases among restaurant and pub workers, leading
many
other countries to adopt similar measures.
The second main reason why this
ban
is warranted
is that it
helps
those addicted to cigarettes quit their habit. A law prohibiting
smoking
in
public
areas would force smokers to
leave
the
company
of everyone else if they want to have a cigarette. Most
people
dislike feeling
ostracised
, and this would provide excellent motivation to quit.
For instance
, social pressure brought about by
smoking
bans
is
often
cited by ex-smokers as one of the reasons they gave up the habit.
In conclusion
, this essay believes that making it against the law to smoke in
public
should
be encouraged
because
it
prevents
innocent
people
from developing serious health conditions caused by passive
smoking
and
reduces
the number of smokers.