Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.
Check Your Text it's free

In cities space of housing should be created by knocking down historic buildings it is negative or positive development

In cities space of housing should be created by knocking down historic buildings it is negative or positive development GlPNj
Lake of land for accommodation is a major concern worldwide. Especially in megacities, tore down Heritage buildings is common in order to build housing. In my opinion, it is a negative development for the nation because it will have a dismal effect on Tourist Industry as well as reduced the charm of the city. Knocking down history building is not a good idea. First and foremost, historic places have religious value. Each place and buildings made in a bygone era has emotional value for people. For example, the Jumma masjid is symbolic for the Muslim community and Somnath Temple is a historical place for Hindu society. Hence, it might hurt the sentiment of people if those buildings will be knocked down. In addition to this, S reason for this trend is that a tourist preferred to visit the historical place to learn the history of any country. If historic buildings and places are not there to live the visitors that tourist do not prefer to visit such place consequently, because of this scenario, cities lose its charm to attract masses which has a detrimental effect on Tourist Industry of the nation. Last but not least, some places are known for their historic infrastructure such as India known for the Taj Mahal Egypt known for the mummy and Paris known for the Eiffel Tower. If those buildings Store download them City or country will have a drop its significance. It will have a ramification on national identity also mitigate the value of the particular nation in the world. In conclusion, it is evidently true that historical building should not be knockdown for build the accommodation as it hurts the national identity, tourist industry of the nation and it might hurt sentimentality of religious him individuals.
Lake of land for accommodation is a major concern worldwide.
Especially
in
Possible spelling mistake found.
megacities
, tore down Heritage
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
buildings
is common in order to build housing. In my opinion, it is a
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
negative
development for the nation
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
because
it will have a dismal effect on
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
Tourist
Industry
as well
as
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
reduced
the charm of the city.

Knocking down history
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
building
is not a
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
good
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
idea
.
First
and foremost, historic
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
places
have religious value. Each
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
place
and
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
buildings
made in a bygone era has emotional value for
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
people
.
For example
, the
Possible spelling mistake found.
Jumma
Possible spelling mistake found.
masjid
is symbolic for the Muslim community and
Possible spelling mistake found.
Somnath
Temple is a historical
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
place
for Hindu society.
Hence
, it might hurt the sentiment of
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
people
if those
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
buildings
will
be knocked
down.

In addition
to this, S reason for this trend is that a
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
tourist
preferred to visit the historical
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
place
to learn the history of any country. If historic
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
buildings
and
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
places
are not there to
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
live
the visitors that
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
tourist
do not prefer to visit such
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
place
consequently
,
because of this
scenario, cities lose its charm to attract masses which has a detrimental effect on
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
Tourist
Industry of the nation.

Last
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
but
not least,
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
some
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
places
are
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
known
for their historic infrastructure such as India
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
known
for the Taj Mahal Egypt
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
known
for the
In some contexts, this is childish language. Consider alternatives.
mummy
and Paris
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
known
for the Eiffel Tower. If those
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
buildings
Store download them City or country will have a drop its significance. It will have a ramification on national identity
also
mitigate the value of the particular nation in the world.

In conclusion
, it is
evidently
true that historical
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
building
should not be knockdown for build the accommodation as it hurts the national identity,
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
tourist
industry of the nation and it might hurt sentimentality of religious him individuals.
What do you think?
  • This is funny writingFunny
  • I love this writingLove
  • This writing has blown my mindWow
  • It made me angryAngry
  • It made me sadSad

IELTS essay In cities space of housing should be created by knocking down historic buildings it is negative or positive development

Essay
  American English
5 paragraphs
294 words
6.0
Overall Band Score
Coherence and Cohesion: 7.0
  • Structure your answers in logical paragraphs
  • ?
    One main idea per paragraph
  • Include an introduction and conclusion
  • Support main points with an explanation and then an example
  • Use cohesive linking words accurately and appropriately
  • Vary your linking phrases using synonyms
Lexical Resource: 5.0
  • Try to vary your vocabulary using accurate synonyms
  • Use less common question specific words that accurately convey meaning
  • Check your work for spelling and word formation mistakes
Grammatical Range: 6.5
  • Use a variety of complex and simple sentences
  • Check your writing for errors
Task Achievement: 6.0
  • Answer all parts of the question
  • ?
    Present relevant ideas
  • Fully explain these ideas
  • Support ideas with relevant, specific examples
Labels Descriptions
  • ?
    Currently is not available
  • Meet the criteria
  • Doesn't meet the criteria
Recent posts