Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.
Check Your Text it's free

Immunisation programs can prevent common childhood illnesses. Should immunisation of children be compulsory or should parents have the right to reject such programs?

Immunisation programs can prevent common childhood illnesses. Should immunisation of children be compulsory or should parents have the right to reject such programs? m19AL
A currently contentious issue relates to whether vaccination programs should be mandatory so that youngsters will not suffer from sicknesses or whether parents should be free to choose if they get their children immunized. In this essay, I am going to explain why immunization has to be compulsory. First of all, immunization programs greatly contribute to the development of nations. In fact, such programs are said to be a driving force behind the economic advancement of developed countries. This is because vaccination reduces the number of children dying before they become five years old, providing countries with sufficient labour forces. For example, It is said that If vaccination became more common in African nations, where about 90 out of 1, 000 children pass away by the time they are five years old, they would lift themselves out of poverty. Secondly, most parents are not engaged in jobs in the medical fields. This means that they cannot make proper decisions concerning people’s health. For instance, there was a child killed by a terminal disease in Japan. The doctors who treated her suggested that she be vaccinated to recuperate from the sickness, but her father, who was not a medical practitioner, turned down the suggestion, leading to the death of the child. He firmly believed that if she received the vaccine, she would pass away. However, medical authorities claimed the completely opposite thing. With proper vaccination, she would still be alive. Some claim that the right should be given to parents to choose whether to immunize their children. This is because freedom of choice is the most fundamental principle of all. However, above all, people’s health must come first. To conclude, there seem to be more benefits than drawbacks to making immunization programs mandatory. Considering the preciousness of youngsters’ lives, there are no reasons governments should not make it illegal for parents to prevent children from being vaccinated.
A
currently
contentious issue relates to whether vaccination
programs
should be mandatory
so
that youngsters will not suffer from sicknesses or whether
parents
should be free to choose if they
get
their
children
immunized. In this essay, I am going to
explain
why immunization
has to
be compulsory.

First of all
, immunization
programs
greatly
contribute to the development of nations. In fact, such
programs
are said
to be a driving force behind the economic advancement of
developed countries
. This is
because
vaccination
reduces
the number of
children
dying
before
they become five years
old
, providing countries with sufficient
labour
forces.
For example
, It
is said
that If vaccination became more common in African nations, where about 90 out of 1, 000
children
pass away by the time they are five years
old
, they would lift themselves out of poverty.

Secondly
, most
parents
are not engaged in jobs in the medical fields. This means that they cannot
make
proper decisions concerning
people
’s health.
For instance
, there was a child killed by a terminal disease in Japan. The doctors who treated her suggested that she
be vaccinated
to recuperate from the sickness,
but
her father, who was not a medical practitioner, turned down the suggestion, leading to the death of the child. He
firmly
believed that if she received the vaccine, she would pass away.
However
, medical authorities claimed the completely opposite thing. With proper vaccination, she would
still
be alive.
Some
claim that the right should be
given
to
parents
to choose whether to immunize their
children
. This is
because
freedom of choice is the most fundamental principle of all.
However
,
above all
,
people
’s health
must
come
first
.

To conclude
, there seem to be more benefits than drawbacks to making immunization
programs
mandatory. Considering the preciousness of youngsters’
lives
, there are no reasons
governments
should not
make
it illegal for
parents
to
prevent
children
from
being vaccinated
.
What do you think?
  • This is funny writingFunny
  • I love this writingLove
  • This writing has blown my mindWow
  • It made me angryAngry
  • It made me sadSad

IELTS essay Immunisation programs can prevent common childhood illnesses. Should immunisation of children be compulsory or should parents have the right to reject such programs?

Essay
  American English
4 paragraphs
316 words
7
Overall Band Score
Coherence and Cohesion: 7.0
  • Structure your answers in logical paragraphs
  • ?
    One main idea per paragraph
  • Include an introduction and conclusion
  • Support main points with an explanation and then an example
  • Use cohesive linking words accurately and appropriately
  • Vary your linking phrases using synonyms
Lexical Resource: 7.0
  • Try to vary your vocabulary using accurate synonyms
  • Use less common question specific words that accurately convey meaning
  • Check your work for spelling and word formation mistakes
Grammatical Range: 7.0
  • Use a variety of complex and simple sentences
  • Check your writing for errors
Task Achievement: 7.0
  • Answer all parts of the question
  • ?
    Present relevant ideas
  • Fully explain these ideas
  • Support ideas with relevant, specific examples
Labels Descriptions
  • ?
    Currently is not available
  • Meet the criteria
  • Doesn't meet the criteria
Recent posts