Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.
Check Your Text it's free

Human people are increasing day by day, so what will be the impact on birds population due to change of human population is the concerning matter for both the reading and the lecture.

Human people are increasing day by day, so what will be the impact on birds population due to change of human population is the concerning matter for both the reading and the lecture. VBnJO
Human people are increasing day by day, so what will be the impact on birds population due to change of human population is the concerning matter for both the reading and the lecture. The authors avers that the number of bird population will continuously decrease in future and he establishes his point by providing three most import reasons for it. However, the professor states the idea that due to increasing of mankind, the birds population will not vanish. First of all, the author claims that bird's natural habitats will not remain at all due to expanding use of land for human activities; as a result, the birds will not get place to live in future. This point is challenged by the professor, and he says that it is not a good prediction since only few types of birds will affected by this urbanization. Moreover, there are many birds whose live at city areas, and they successfully habitats in there. Secondly, since to satisfy human need farmland will be extended in areas where wild bird live, birds will be faced severe problems for its habitats, is claimed by the writer in the reading. However, the lecturer rebuts this assumption by informing that the recent technological advancement will change the situation. He also mentions that now people start to cultivate more yielding crops which need much less areas and produce huge food, so people will not need to destroy birds' natural habitats. Finally, the reading estimates that since people will use more pesticides to protect crops from insects and pests, those toxic pesticides will be the part of the food chain in which the bird survive. As a result, a large portion of birds will vanish from this word. The professor, on the other hand, states that author's prediction is not correct, and claims that no such thing will occur in future because people will not use traditional poisonous elements in that time. He also mentions that people will use less toxic chemical to control insects, and they might start to grow pest resistant crops. As a result, pest resistant trees will not be the responsibility of vanishing birds population.
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
Human
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
people
are increasing day by day,
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
so
what will be the impact on
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
birds
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
population
due to
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
change
of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
human
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
population
is the concerning matter for both the reading and the lecture. The authors
You should probably use "aver".
avers
that the number of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
bird
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
population
will
continuously
decrease in
Use a comma before 'and' if it connects two independent clauses (unless they are closely connected and short).
future and
he establishes his point by providing three most import reasons for it.
However
, the professor states the
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
idea
that due to increasing of mankind, the
Apostrophe might be missing. Did you mean "birds'" or "bird's"?
birds
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
population
will not vanish.

This phrase is redundant. Consider using "first".
First of all
, the author claims that bird's natural habitats will not remain at all due to expanding
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
use
of land for
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
human
activities;
as a result
, the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
birds
will not
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
get
place to
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
live
Did you mean: "in the future"?
in future
. This point
is challenged
by the professor, and he says that it is not a
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
good
prediction since
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
only
few types of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
birds
will
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
affected
by this urbanization.
Moreover
, there are
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
many
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
birds
whose
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
live
at city areas, and they
successfully
habitats in there.

Secondly
, since to satisfy
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
human
need farmland will
be extended
in areas where wild
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
bird
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
live
,
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
birds
will
be faced
severe problems for its habitats,
is claimed
by the writer in the reading.
However
, the lecturer rebuts this assumption by informing that the recent technological advancement will
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
change
the situation. He
also
mentions that
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
now
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
people
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
start
to cultivate more yielding crops which need much
Did you mean "fewer"? The noun areas is countable.
less
areas and produce huge food,
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
so
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
people
will not need to
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
destroy
birds' natural habitats.

Finally
, the reading estimates that since
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
people
will
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
use
more pesticides to protect crops from insects and pests, those toxic pesticides will be the part of the food chain in which the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
bird
Possible agreement error - use third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: "survives".
survive
.
As a result
, a large portion of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
birds
will vanish from this word. The professor,
on the other hand
, states that author's prediction is not correct, and claims that no such thing will occur in future
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
because
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
people
will not
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
use
traditional poisonous elements in that time. He
also
mentions that
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
people
will
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
use
less toxic chemical to control insects, and they might
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
start
to grow pest resistant crops.
As a result
, pest resistant trees will not be the responsibility of vanishing
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
birds
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
population
.
What do you think?
  • This is funny writingFunny
  • I love this writingLove
  • This writing has blown my mindWow
  • It made me angryAngry
  • It made me sadSad

IELTS essay Human people are increasing day by day, so what will be the impact on birds population due to change of human population is the concerning matter for both the reading and the lecture.

Essay
  American English
4 paragraphs
358 words
5.5
Overall Band Score
Coherence and Cohesion: 5.5
  • Structure your answers in logical paragraphs
  • ?
    One main idea per paragraph
  • Include an introduction and conclusion
  • Support main points with an explanation and then an example
  • Use cohesive linking words accurately and appropriately
  • Vary your linking phrases using synonyms
Lexical Resource: 5.5
  • Try to vary your vocabulary using accurate synonyms
  • Use less common question specific words that accurately convey meaning
  • Check your work for spelling and word formation mistakes
Grammatical Range: 6.5
  • Use a variety of complex and simple sentences
  • Check your writing for errors
Task Achievement: 5.0
  • Answer all parts of the question
  • ?
    Present relevant ideas
  • Fully explain these ideas
  • Support ideas with relevant, specific examples
Labels Descriptions
  • ?
    Currently is not available
  • Meet the criteria
  • Doesn't meet the criteria
Recent posts





Get more results for topic:
  • Human people are increasing day by day, so what will be the impact on birds population due to change of human population is the concerning matter for both the reading and the lecture.