Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.
Check Your Text it's free

How do you think the case will be resolved in the court, provided the Precedent 14/2017?

How do you think the case will be resolved in the court, provided the Precedent 14/2017? lLkWb
In this case, the client, Ms. Linh who sued her ex-boyfriend, Mr. Hai, asking him to perform a contracts for gifts of property. Ms. Linh and Mr. Hai started dating on 14 February 2016 and on 8 March 2017, the two entered into a gifting contract with the content " Nguyen Quan Hai promised to give Hoang Thuy Linh a diamond ring on the fifth anniversary of the relationship". But on 17 September 2020, the two broke up. * According to the Civil Code 2015 as well as the Precedent 14/2017/AL, the Court may consider this a conditional gifting contract because of the following reasons: - First of all, in this contract, there are two participants: Mr. Hai is the giver and Ms. Linh is the recipient. The two people reached an agreement on Mr. Hai handing over the property to Ms. Linh. The object of the gift of the property is a diamond ring. This contract is expressed in writing, so it is first and foremost a contract for gifts of property.
In this case
, the client, Ms.
Possible spelling mistake found.
Linh
who sued her ex-boyfriend, Mr.
Possible spelling mistake found.
Hai
, asking him to perform a
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
contracts
for gifts of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
property
. Ms.
Possible spelling mistake found.
Linh
and Mr.
Possible spelling mistake found.
Hai
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
started
dating on 14 February 2016 and on 8 March 2017, the two entered into a gifting
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
contract
with the content
Don't put a space on both sides of a quote symbol
"
Nguyen
Possible spelling mistake found.
Quan
Possible spelling mistake found.
Hai
promised to give
Possible spelling mistake found.
Hoang
Possible spelling mistake found.
Thuy
Possible spelling mistake found.
Linh
a diamond ring on the fifth anniversary of the relationship
Use a smart closing quote here: "”".
"
.
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
But
on 17 September 2020, the two broke up.

* According to the Civil Code 2015
as well
as the Precedent 14/2017/AL, the Court may consider this a conditional gifting
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
contract
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
because
of the following reasons:

Consider using an m-dash in dialogues and enumerations.
-
This phrase is redundant. Consider using "first".
First of all
, in this
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
contract
, there are two participants: Mr.
Possible spelling mistake found.
Hai
is the giver and Ms.
Possible spelling mistake found.
Linh is
the recipient. The two
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
people
reached an agreement on Mr.
Possible spelling mistake found.
Hai
handing over the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
property
to Ms.
Possible spelling mistake found.
Linh
. The object of the gift of the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
property
is a diamond ring. This
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
contract
is expressed
in writing,
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
so
it is
first
and foremost a
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
contract
for gifts of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
property
.
What do you think?
  • This is funny writingFunny
  • I love this writingLove
  • This writing has blown my mindWow
  • It made me angryAngry
  • It made me sadSad

IELTS essay How do you think the case will be resolved in the court, provided the Precedent 14/2017?

Essay
  American English
3 paragraphs
173 words
This writing has been penalized,
text can't be
less than 250 words in Task 2
and less than 150 words in Task 1
5.0
Overall Band Score
Coherence and Cohesion: 5.5
  • Structure your answers in logical paragraphs
  • ?
    One main idea per paragraph
  • Include an introduction and conclusion
  • Support main points with an explanation and then an example
  • Use cohesive linking words accurately and appropriately
  • Vary your linking phrases using synonyms
Lexical Resource: 5.0
  • Try to vary your vocabulary using accurate synonyms
  • Use less common question specific words that accurately convey meaning
  • Check your work for spelling and word formation mistakes
Grammatical Range: 6.0
  • Use a variety of complex and simple sentences
  • Check your writing for errors
Task Achievement: 5.0
  • Answer all parts of the question
  • ?
    Present relevant ideas
  • Fully explain these ideas
  • Support ideas with relevant, specific examples
Labels Descriptions
  • ?
    Currently is not available
  • Meet the criteria
  • Doesn't meet the criteria
Recent posts