Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.
Check Your Text it's free

Harsh punishment from government is necessary or not to improve road safety.

Harsh punishment from government is necessary or not to improve road safety. lLaxW
Since the past rush propulsive has been major problem in the cities of the most nations. A number of people believe that government should not impose the strict action to control over the lane accidents on the contrary in my opinion it's unfair, authorities must do and it's more convenient way for improving the thoroughfare safety. Firstly, if strict actions are not there public ignore the traffic rules, breaking the signals and over speeding due to the fact they don't have any fear of legislative action as it's relaxed by government. Secondly, society start propulsive in the influence of alcohol and might be loose the command as a consequence they may crush innocent one or get collide the other wagons eventually resulted into the permanent disability or losing the life. Finally, with the lack of harsh trouble from government they start driving on their own prospect and proper pattern of driving should not be followed. This will result into traffic and people suffer a lot in everyday life. Also, we can't ensure whether pollution is controlled or not due to the fact they will ignore the pollution mitigation rules for example do not inspect vehicle periodically, fixing loud horns etc. On other hand, certain group or individuals believe that harsh torture is not necessary. We can achieve safe road environment by awareness programs that can be either run online or conducting the physical seminars. In addition, we can make feel shy to individual when brakes the traffic rules for example by giving welcome flower. By outset educate and aware public they also be the responsible towards such things. In brief, according to my view to batter control over traffic accidents and ensure road safety a set of harsh punishment should be imposed which I elaborate
Since
the past rush propulsive has been major problem in the cities of the most nations. A number of
people
believe that
government
should not impose the strict action to control over the lane accidents
on the contrary
in my opinion it's unfair, authorities
must
do and it's more convenient way for improving the thoroughfare safety.
Firstly
, if strict actions are not there public
ignore
the
traffic
rules
, breaking the signals and over speeding due to the fact they don't have any fear of legislative action as it's relaxed by
government
.
Secondly
, society
start
propulsive in the influence of alcohol and might be loose the command as a consequence they may crush innocent one or
get
collide the other wagons
eventually
resulted into the permanent disability or losing the life.
Finally
, with the lack of harsh trouble from
government
they
start
driving on their
own
prospect and proper pattern of driving should not
be followed
. This will result into
traffic
and
people
suffer a lot in everyday life.
Also
, we can't ensure whether pollution
is controlled
or not due to the fact they will
ignore
the pollution mitigation
rules
for example
do not inspect vehicle
periodically
, fixing loud horns etc.

On other hand, certain group or individuals believe that harsh torture is not necessary. We can achieve safe road environment by awareness programs that can be either run online or conducting the physical seminars.
In addition
, we can
make
feel shy to individual when brakes the
traffic
rules
for example
by giving welcome flower. By outset educate and aware public they
also
be the responsible towards such things.

In brief
, according to my view to batter control over
traffic
accidents and ensure road safety a set of harsh punishment should
be imposed
which I elaborate
What do you think?
  • This is funny writingFunny
  • I love this writingLove
  • This writing has blown my mindWow
  • It made me angryAngry
  • It made me sadSad

IELTS essay Harsh punishment from government is necessary or not to improve road safety.

Essay
  American English
3 paragraphs
294 words
6.5
Overall Band Score
Coherence and Cohesion: 5.5
  • Structure your answers in logical paragraphs
  • ?
    One main idea per paragraph
  • Include an introduction and conclusion
  • Support main points with an explanation and then an example
  • Use cohesive linking words accurately and appropriately
  • Vary your linking phrases using synonyms
Lexical Resource: 6.0
  • Try to vary your vocabulary using accurate synonyms
  • Use less common question specific words that accurately convey meaning
  • Check your work for spelling and word formation mistakes
Grammatical Range: 6.5
  • Use a variety of complex and simple sentences
  • Check your writing for errors
Task Achievement: 7.0
  • Answer all parts of the question
  • ?
    Present relevant ideas
  • Fully explain these ideas
  • Support ideas with relevant, specific examples
Labels Descriptions
  • ?
    Currently is not available
  • Meet the criteria
  • Doesn't meet the criteria
Recent posts