Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.
Check Your Text it's free

Governments should spend money on railways rather than roads. To what extend do you agree or disagree with this statement?

Governments should spend money on railways rather than roads. with this statement? ljW5Q
An increasing concern for many economies around the world is whether construct railroads rather than highways. I partially agree with governments ought to spend money on railroads, and in this essay I will provide some arguments to support my opinion. Generally speaking, there are a number of reasons that why economies prioritise to construct railroads throughout the nation. A further point in favour of constructing railroads all over the nation is that less trade cost for corporations, this actively demonstrates that corporations will able to get competitive advantage while transporting its goods in order to transmit/convey either consumers or harbours. Furthermore, spending considerably amount on constructing railroads is also accelerates industrial development. The particular reason for the circumstance is harbours will be linked with railroads, thus, corporation within nation will get an opportunity to international trade and sale their goods to overseas nations, which brings money in nation, moreover, it makes nation a richest. As a result of international trade, a nation will provide revenue such as tax and even tariffs. Despite these arguments, many governments do not prioritise to construct railroads anyways. Many of them would rather construct highways instead of railroads, which less safer than railroads. However, highways are more popular trade way in modern society. A further point in against constructing highways rather than railroads is that it might be more costly for corporations because corporations have to pay extra cost such as fuel, highways fees, insurances while transporting their goods. I, therefore, believe that constructing highways in order to enhance to industrial development and earn an extra income is not rational choice to maintain as a trade policies throughout a nation because of additional costs. In conclusion, this is topic which raises strong passions on both sides of the argument associated with economists. Nation will be strengthen its welfare level if a nation has effective opportunity to reach a trade such as railroads. I quite strongly believe that governments ought to spend more and more money to construct railroads in a nation.
An increasing concern for
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
many
economies around the world is whether
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
construct
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
railroads
rather
than
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
highways
. I
partially
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
agree
with
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
governments
ought to spend money on
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
railroads
, and in this essay I will provide
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
some
arguments to support my opinion.

Generally
speaking, there are a number of reasons that why economies
Possible spelling mistake. 'prioritise' is British English.
prioritise
to
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
construct
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
railroads
throughout the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
nation
. A
further
point in
Possible spelling mistake. 'favour' is British English.
favour
of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
constructing
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
railroads
all over the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
nation
is that less
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
trade
cost for
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
corporations
, this
actively
demonstrates that
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
corporations
will able to
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
get
competitive advantage while transporting its
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
goods
in order to transmit/convey either consumers or
Possible spelling mistake. 'harbours' is British English.
harbours
.

Furthermore
, spending
considerably
amount on
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
constructing
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
railroads
is
also
accelerates industrial development. The particular reason for the circumstance is
Possible spelling mistake. 'harbours' is British English.
harbours
will
be linked
with
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
railroads
,
thus
,
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
corporation
within
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
nation
will
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
get
an opportunity to international
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
trade
and sale their
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
goods
to overseas
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
nations
, which brings money in
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
nation
,
moreover
, it
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
makes
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
nation
Use "the" with the superlative.
a
richest.
As a result
of international
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
trade
, a
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
nation
will provide revenue such as tax and even tariffs.

Despite these arguments,
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
many
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
governments
do not
Possible spelling mistake. 'prioritise' is British English.
prioritise
to
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
construct
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
railroads
anyways.
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
Many
of them would
rather
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
construct
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
highways
instead
of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
railroads
, which
Non-standard use of the comparative or superlative. Did you mean "less safe"?
less safer
than
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
railroads
.
However
,
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
highways
are more popular
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
trade
way in modern society. A
further
point in against
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
constructing
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
highways
rather
than
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
railroads
is that it might be more costly for
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
corporations
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
because
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
corporations
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
have to
pay extra cost such as fuel,
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
highways
fees, insurances while transporting their
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
goods
. I,
therefore
, believe that
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
constructing
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
highways
in order to enhance to industrial development and earn an extra income is not rational choice to maintain as a
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
trade
Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean "policy"?
policies
throughout a
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
nation
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
because
of additional costs.

In conclusion
, this is topic which raises strong passions on both sides of the argument associated with economists.
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
Nation
will be
Consider using the past participle "strengthened"?
strengthen
its welfare level if a
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
nation
has effective opportunity to reach a
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
trade
such as
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
railroads
. I quite
strongly
believe that
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
governments
ought to spend more and more money to
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
construct
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
railroads
in a
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
nation
.
What do you think?
  • This is funny writingFunny
  • I love this writingLove
  • This writing has blown my mindWow
  • It made me angryAngry
  • It made me sadSad

IELTS essay Governments should spend money on railways rather than roads. with this statement?

Essay
  American English
5 paragraphs
336 words
6.0
Overall Band Score
Coherence and Cohesion: 6.5
  • Structure your answers in logical paragraphs
  • ?
    One main idea per paragraph
  • Include an introduction and conclusion
  • Support main points with an explanation and then an example
  • Use cohesive linking words accurately and appropriately
  • Vary your linking phrases using synonyms
Lexical Resource: 5.0
  • Try to vary your vocabulary using accurate synonyms
  • Use less common question specific words that accurately convey meaning
  • Check your work for spelling and word formation mistakes
Grammatical Range: 6.5
  • Use a variety of complex and simple sentences
  • Check your writing for errors
Task Achievement: 5.0
  • Answer all parts of the question
  • ?
    Present relevant ideas
  • Fully explain these ideas
  • Support ideas with relevant, specific examples
Labels Descriptions
  • ?
    Currently is not available
  • Meet the criteria
  • Doesn't meet the criteria
Recent posts