Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.
Check Your Text it's free

Governments should spend money on railways rather than roads. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?

The governments of the countries have to do expenses on rails more than roads. In my opinion, I disagree that railways are more significant than roads. I believe that roads are a key role of transportation for example cars, buses. It is probably true to say that governments spend more money on railways and construction of the rails is expensive. However, in every place it will be hard to built railways such as mountains, forests. I hold the view that in mountains will be easier to construct roads, because highness will be dreadful for trains and rails which can lead accidents in order to the longest of the vans of the trains. Nobody would dispute the fact that there may be car accidents either, but in comparison with trains the damages will be less than railway roads. The price of the trains and rails is more valuable by money. In my view, roads will cost less money in construction. Therefore, people use their own cars or buses in the travelling. It is widely thought that people reach to their destinations earlier by car than trains. If we compare money of the tickets of railway and road transport in the same distance, we will see that transports on the roads are more reasonable than transports on railways. In conclusion, it seems that to build and use roads is cheaper than railways. Hence, governments have to spend more money on roads not railways due to the reasons I have mentioned above.
The
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
governments
of the countries
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
have to
do expenses on rails more than
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
roads
. In my opinion, I disagree that
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
railways
are more significant than
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
roads
. I believe that
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
roads
are a key role of transportation
for example
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
cars
, buses.

It is
probably
true to say that
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
governments
spend more
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
money
on
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
railways
and construction of the rails is expensive.
However
, in every place it will be
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
hard
to built
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
railways
such as mountains, forests. I hold the view that in mountains will be easier to construct
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
roads
,
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
because
highness will be dreadful for
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
trains
and rails which can lead accidents in order to the longest of the vans of the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
trains
. Nobody would dispute the fact that there may be
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
car
accidents either,
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
but
in comparison
with
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
trains
the damages will be less than
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
railway
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
roads
. The price of the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
trains
and rails is more valuable by
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
money
. In my view,
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
roads
will cost less
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
money
in construction.
Therefore
,
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
people
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
use
their
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
own
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
cars
or buses in the travelling. It is
widely
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
thought
that
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
people
reach to their destinations earlier by
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
car
than
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
trains
. If we compare
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
money
of the tickets of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
railway
and
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
road
transport in the same distance, we will
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
see
that transports on the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
roads
are more reasonable than transports on railways.

In conclusion
, it seems that to build and
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
use
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
roads
is cheaper than
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
railways
.
Hence
,
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
governments
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
have to
spend more
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
money
on
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
roads
not
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
railways
due to the reasons I have mentioned above.

IELTS essay Governments should spend money on railways rather than roads. with this statement?

Essay
  American English
3 paragraphs
249 words
This writing has been penalized,
text can't be
less than 250 words in Task 2
and less than 150 words in Task 1
4.0
Overall Band Score
Coherence and Cohesion: 5.5
  • Structure your answers in logical paragraphs
  • ?
    One main idea per paragraph
  • Include an introduction and conclusion
  • Support main points with an explanation and then an example
  • Use cohesive linking words accurately and appropriately
  • Vary your linking phrases using synonyms
Lexical Resource: 5.5
  • Try to vary your vocabulary using accurate synonyms
  • Use less common question specific words that accurately convey meaning
  • Check your work for spelling and word formation mistakes
Grammatical Range: 6.0
  • Use a variety of complex and simple sentences
  • Check your writing for errors
Task Achievement: 6.0
  • Answer all parts of the question
  • ?
    Present relevant ideas
  • Fully explain these ideas
  • Support ideas with relevant, specific examples
Labels Descriptions
  • ?
    Currently is not available
  • Meet the criteria
  • Doesn't meet the criteria
Recent posts





Get more results for topic:
  • Governments should spend money on railways rather than roads. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?