Rather than government swallow up the money for arts like music and theater, It will be wonderful if they spend on public services. On the whole, I do not agree with the statement due to a reason will be discussed on this essay.
First, art is truly place for people release their adrenaline hormone especially for youth. Trough this area, adrenaline hormone will be directed to positive way. If government do not presence the facility for creativity, naughtiness will be way for people to release it. For instance, in developing country, there are numerous juvenile delinquency. This problem have ruined the generation from that country. It is triggered by there is no place for them to release their hormone.
Second, art do not spend money by comparison other area in government budget. It just a tiny fraction of government budget, yet have extraordinary effect such as been explained above.
On other hand, not a few people agree with this. They argue art can not serve their business. Furthermore, they have a tendency to want facilities rather than the budget waste on art. Yet, art can be place for all of person to create anything and it is a form facility.
In conclusion, art is not only tiny side that can be forgotten. It has long term effect for nation. So, the reduction or abolition of art expense and converted to public services is not fully fabulous option. We still need art as a place to release our adrenaline and show our capability.
Rather
than
government
swallow up the money for
arts
like music and theater, It will be wonderful if they spend on public services.
On the whole
, I do not
agree
with the statement due to a reason will
be discussed
on this essay.
First
,
art
is
truly
place
for
people
release
their adrenaline hormone
especially
for youth. Trough this area, adrenaline hormone will
be directed
to
positive
way. If
government
do not presence the facility for creativity, naughtiness will be way for
people
to
release
it.
For instance
, in
developing country
, there are numerous juvenile delinquency.
This problem have
ruined the generation from that country. It
is triggered
by there is no
place
for them to
release
their hormone.
Second,
art
do not spend money by comparison other area in
government
budget. It
just
a tiny fraction of
government
budget,
yet
have extraordinary effect such as been
explained
above.
On other hand, not a few
people
agree
with this. They argue
art
can not serve their business.
Furthermore
, they have a tendency to want facilities
rather
than the budget waste on
art
.
Yet
,
art
can be
place
for
all of person
to create anything and it is a form facility.
In conclusion
,
art
is not
only
tiny side that can
be forgotten
. It has long
term
effect for nation.
So
, the reduction or abolition of
art
expense and converted to public services is not
fully
fabulous option. We
still
need
art
as a
place
to
release
our adrenaline and
show
our capability.