Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.
Check Your Text it's free

Government Investment In The Arts Is A Waste Of Money v.1

Government Investment In The Arts Is A Waste Of Money v. 1
It is argued that governments are wasting their resources by paying for the preservation of arts and that they would be better off spending the funds on public sectors. While it is crucial to increase spending on public services such as education or transportation, governments should not cut all their expenses on arts. On the one hand, improving public services is crucial for the development of a country. For example, when the funds are utilised for traffic projects like road maintenance or public transportation, the number of traffic accidents will reduce, and people can plan their trips better around the city thanks to frequent bus and train services. Furthermore, with sufficient funding, the authorities can keep public workers happy and avoid their going on strikes. Imagine all teachers in a city stop teaching for a day to protest against low wages. It would lead to classes being cancelled, and parents having to stay home to look after their schoolchildren. That would be a very troublesome / difficult situation for families and offices alike. On the other hand, it is equally important to spend on arts. If the officials decided to stop spending on music and theatre, it would be a serious mistake and could result in the loss of national identity. We all know that arts and culture are interrelated. If a country does not emphasize on preserving arts, the cultural aspects associated with traditional music and theatre will gradually disappear. The nation will in turn lose their cultural uniqueness, which is of great importance for tourism. If travellers find nothing extraordinary about a culture, it is less likely that they will make that country their desired destination. In conclusion, I am against the idea of governments cutting all investment in arts to spend on public services. The authorities should balance their spending between these two sectors so public services can operate smoothly and at the same time cultural diversity and uniqueness can be maintained
It
is argued
that
governments
are wasting their resources by paying for the preservation of
arts
and that they would be better off
spending
the funds on
public
sectors. While it is crucial to increase
spending
on
public
services
such as education or transportation,
governments
should not
cut
all their expenses on arts.

On the one hand, improving
public
services
is crucial for the development of a country.
For example
, when the funds are
utilised
for traffic projects like road maintenance or
public
transportation, the number of traffic accidents will
reduce
, and
people
can plan their trips better around the city thanks to frequent bus and train
services
.
Furthermore
, with sufficient funding, the authorities can
keep
public
workers happy and avoid their going on strikes. Imagine all teachers in a city
stop
teaching for a day to protest against low wages. It would lead to classes
being cancelled
, and parents having to stay home to look after their schoolchildren. That would be a
very
troublesome / difficult situation for families and offices alike.

On the other hand
, it is
equally
important
to spend on
arts
. If the officials decided to
stop
spending
on music and
theatre
, it would be a serious mistake and could result in the loss of national identity. We all know that
arts
and culture
are interrelated
. If a country does not emphasize on preserving
arts
, the cultural aspects associated with traditional music and
theatre
will
gradually
disappear. The nation will in turn lose their cultural uniqueness, which is of great importance for tourism. If
travellers
find nothing extraordinary about a culture, it is less likely that they will
make
that country their desired destination.

In conclusion
, I am against the
idea
of
governments
cutting all investment in
arts
to spend on
public
services
. The authorities should balance their
spending
between these two sectors
so
public
services
can operate
smoothly
and at the same time cultural diversity and uniqueness can be
maintained
5Linking words, meeting the goal of 7 or more
21Repeated words, meeting the goal of 3 or fewer
5Mistakes
Learning is a treasure that will follow its owner everywhere.
Chinese Proverb

IELTS essay Government Investment In The Arts Is A Waste Of Money v. 1

Essay
  American English
4 paragraphs
324 words
6
Overall Band Score
Coherence and Cohesion: 5.5
  • Structure your answers in logical paragraphs
  • ?
    One main idea per paragraph
  • Include an introduction and conclusion
  • Support main points with an explanation and then an example
  • Use cohesive linking words accurately and appropriately
  • Vary your linking phrases using synonyms
Lexical Resource: 5.0
  • Try to vary your vocabulary using accurate synonyms
  • Use less common question specific words that accurately convey meaning
  • Check your work for spelling and word formation mistakes
Grammatical Range: 6.5
  • Use a variety of complex and simple sentences
  • Check your writing for errors
Task Achievement: 6.0
  • Answer all parts of the question
  • ?
    Present relevant ideas
  • Fully explain these ideas
  • Support ideas with relevant, specific examples
Labels Descriptions
  • ?
    Currently is not available
  • Meet the criteria
  • Doesn't meet the criteria