Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.
Check Your Text it's free

Government increasing taxation on petroleum products,many consider it not beneficial. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Government increasing taxation on petroleum products, many consider it not beneficial. 5bA9Q
In recent times, increasing taxation is seen by the government on petroleum. Although, many individuals believe that such a step is inappropriate. I disagree with their view to a large extent. My position is further elaborated with reasons in examples. Out of all the reason, the foremost argument to justify my stand is that as increasing pollution and concern of climate change, heavy taxation on petroleum products is necessary. This is due to excessive consumption by the public. If prices of petrol, diesel are high, people will consider using personal vehicle really and prefer travelling in public transportation. In addition to this, by taking such steps, it can be helpful in reducing the use of fuel powered vehicles. As most governments are promoting the use of alternate sources such as electric powered vehicle, due to heavy taxes and increase prices of of fuel, people would consider moving towards electric vehicles. Which would also assist in reducing the carbon footprint worldwide. However, on the contrary, it can be stated that search and implementation should lead to inflation of prices of all products. Every other service or product is linked to petroleum one way or another. For example, almost all products and services require transportation, why prices of fuel would increase, it would also led to increase in transportation cost, eventually increasing the overall price of the product. Thus, to conclude the discussion it can be commented that despite the fact that prices would increase, I believe increasing taxation on petroleum products would be beneficial in long term and is a more rational approach.
In recent times,
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
increasing
taxation is
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
seen
by the
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
government
on
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
petroleum
.
“Although” at the beginning of a sentence usually requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
Although
,
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
many
individuals believe that such a step is inappropriate. I disagree with their view to a large extent. My position is
further
elaborated with reasons in examples.

Out of all the reason, the foremost argument to justify my stand is that as
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
increasing
pollution and concern of climate
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
change
, heavy taxation on
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
petroleum
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
products
is necessary. This is due to excessive consumption by the public. If
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
prices
of petrol, diesel are high,
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
people
will consider using personal
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
vehicle
really
and prefer travelling in public transportation.

In addition
to this, by taking such steps, it can be helpful in reducing the
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
use
of fuel powered
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
vehicles
. As most
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
governments
are promoting the
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
use
of alternate sources such as electric powered
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
vehicle
, due to heavy taxes and
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
increase
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
prices
Possible typo: you repeated a word
of of
fuel,
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
people
would consider moving towards electric
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
vehicles
.
“Which” at the beginning of a sentence usually requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
Which
would
also
assist in reducing the carbon footprint worldwide.

However
,
on the contrary
, it can
be stated
that search and implementation should lead to inflation of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
prices
of all
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
products
. Every other service or
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
product
is linked
to
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
petroleum
one way or another.
For example
, almost all
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
products
and services require transportation, why
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
prices
of fuel would
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
increase
, it would
also
The verb 'would' requires the base form of the verb: "lead"
led
to
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
increase
in transportation cost,
eventually
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
increasing
the
overall
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
price
of the product.

Thus
,
to conclude
the discussion it can
be commented
that despite the fact that
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
prices
would
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
increase
, I believe
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
increasing
taxation on
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
petroleum
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
products
would be beneficial in long term and is a more rational approach.
What do you think?
  • This is funny writingFunny
  • I love this writingLove
  • This writing has blown my mindWow
  • It made me angryAngry
  • It made me sadSad

IELTS essay Government increasing taxation on petroleum products, many consider it not beneficial.

Essay
  American English
5 paragraphs
262 words
6.0
Overall Band Score
Coherence and Cohesion: 6.5
  • Structure your answers in logical paragraphs
  • ?
    One main idea per paragraph
  • Include an introduction and conclusion
  • Support main points with an explanation and then an example
  • Use cohesive linking words accurately and appropriately
  • Vary your linking phrases using synonyms
Lexical Resource: 5.5
  • Try to vary your vocabulary using accurate synonyms
  • Use less common question specific words that accurately convey meaning
  • Check your work for spelling and word formation mistakes
Grammatical Range: 6.5
  • Use a variety of complex and simple sentences
  • Check your writing for errors
Task Achievement: 6.0
  • Answer all parts of the question
  • ?
    Present relevant ideas
  • Fully explain these ideas
  • Support ideas with relevant, specific examples
Labels Descriptions
  • ?
    Currently is not available
  • Meet the criteria
  • Doesn't meet the criteria
Recent posts





Get more results for topic:
  • Government increasing taxation on petroleum products,many consider it not beneficial. To what extent do you agree or disagree?