The passage asserts that genetically modified trees have some benefecials and provided three reasons of support. The lecture, on the contrary, repudiates this passage' claim and rejects each reason provided by the passage.
First, the reading states that Genetically modified trees are resistent than other nature trees. The professor disavows this point by explaining that these types of trees are resistent to some agents and are weak to other factors such as: weather, insects, and pests. She also avers that non-modified trees are affected by mentioend factors, which destroy all of them.
Second, the genetically modified trees have some financial benefits for farmer, according to the article. The lecturer rebuts this idea by saying that there are more charges on farmers, since they should pay more money for workers to grow these trees, since they must pay money to companies each time they want to plant these kinds of trees.
Third, the article claims that fast grow rate of genetically modified trees provides all demands for wood. The professor disapproves this point by explaining that fast grow rate of those trees hamper growing of other types of tree in region, since they will limit soil, water and sunshine to other trees, hence local trees will die in later stages.
The passage asserts that
genetically
modified
trees
have
some
benefecials
and provided three reasons of support. The lecture,
on the contrary
, repudiates this passage' claim and rejects each reason provided by the passage.
First
, the reading states that
Genetically
modified
trees
are
resistent
than
other
nature
trees
. The professor disavows this point by explaining that these types of
trees
are
resistent
to
some
agents and are weak to
other
factors such as: weather, insects, and pests. She
also
avers that non-modified
trees
are
affected
by
mentioend
factors, which
destroy
all of them.
Second, the
genetically
modified
trees
have
some
financial benefits for farmer, according to the article. The lecturer rebuts this
idea
by saying that there are more charges on farmers, since they should pay more money for workers to grow these
trees
, since they
must
pay money to
companies
each time they want to plant these kinds of trees.
Third, the article claims that
fast
grow rate of
genetically
modified
trees
provides all demands for wood. The professor disapproves this point by explaining that
fast
grow rate of those
trees
hamper growing of
other
types of
tree
in region, since they will limit soil, water and sunshine to
other
trees
,
hence
local
trees
will
die
in later stages.