Different characters are important when people want to decide to hire others as their co-workers, and people can collect information about those features in distinctive methods. In this regard, some people believe that controlling others’ social media account is the best way of understanding about their abilities, while some others think that getting information from their former employers can be better; still others suppose that recruiting them as an apprentice for one month is the best way to be familiar with their skills. As far as I am concerned, I believe that the third idea carries more weight, and I have enough reasons to feel that way. I will illustrate two of which in the following paragraphs.
First and foremost, I personally should consider people’s abilities since I do not have trust to their allegation in their social media or to their former employer’s recommendations. To put it in a more vivid picture, as I almost always need some special abilities for my work, I try to see people’s disparate abilities in person. It is due to the fact that some people may be considered as useful ones by their former employers since they have some related skills while those abilities are not practical in my business. As a result, I have to recruit people as an apprentice for one or two months in order to perceive their usefulness. Take one my previous employee as a way of illustration. I had hired him according to his resume in his social media account and his former employer’s suggestions. Having started his work in my company, he did not reveal any talent in my business or even none of which he claimed about himself in his social media account or his former employer’s recommendations.
Secondly, another quality which is really significant for me is my personal’s personalities, and I cannot understand it unless I be connected with them at least for one month. To clarify this point, people often demonstrate their real personality in life difficulties, and when I examine them for one month, I can find out whether they can keep up with my criteria or not. Take some of my employees in my company, for instance. I always make a contract with them for one month in order to be familiar with their personalities. In addition, I try to detect them in difficulties during that month to see how they cope with them. After I find them as a qualified one, I hire them permanently.
To sum up, all things considered, I firmly believe that hiring people for one month as an apprentice is the best method to understand that whether they are appropriate for my work or not. Given that not only can I see their skills in person, but also I can be cognizant of their personalities.
Different
characters are
important
when
people
want to decide to hire others as their co-workers, and
people
can collect information about those features in distinctive methods. In this regard,
some
people
believe that controlling others’
social
media
account is the best way of understanding about their
abilities
, while
some
others
think
that getting information from their
former
employers
can be better;
still
others suppose that recruiting them as an apprentice for one
month
is the best way to be familiar with their
skills
. As far as I
am concerned
, I believe that the third
idea
carries more weight, and I have
enough
reasons to feel that way. I will illustrate two of which in the following paragraphs.
First
and foremost, I
personally
should consider
people’s
abilities
since I do not have trust to their allegation in their
social
media
or to their
former
employer’s
recommendations. To put it in a more vivid picture, as I almost always need
some
special
abilities
for my work, I try to
see
people’s
disparate
abilities
in person. It is due to the fact that
some
people
may
be considered
as useful ones by their
former
employers
since they have
some
related
skills
while those
abilities
are not practical in my business.
As a result
, I
have to
recruit
people
as an apprentice for one or two
months
in order to perceive their usefulness. Take one my previous employee as a way of illustration. I had hired him according to his resume in his
social
media
account and his
former
employer’s
suggestions. Having
started
his work in my
company
, he did not reveal any talent in my business or even none of which he claimed about himself in his
social
media
account or his
former
employer’s
recommendations.
Secondly
, another quality which is
really
significant for me is my personal’s personalities, and I cannot understand it unless I
be connected
with them at least for one
month
. To clarify this point,
people
often
demonstrate their real
personality
in life difficulties, and when I examine them for one
month
, I can find out whether they can
keep
up with my criteria or not. Take
some
of my employees in my
company
,
for instance
. I always
make
a contract with them for one
month
in order to be familiar with their personalities.
In addition
, I try to detect them in difficulties during that
month
to
see
how they cope with them. After I find them as a qualified one, I hire them
permanently
.
To sum up, all things considered, I
firmly
believe that hiring
people
for one
month
as an apprentice is the best method to understand that whether they are appropriate for my work or not.
Given
that not
only
can I
see
their
skills
in person,
but
also
I can be cognizant of their personalities.