It is not deniable that with the extent of industrial needs, experiments on animals have increased greatly and it has become one of the serious environmental communities concerns, and I believe there have been some movemenents in regard of(? ) complaining(? eteraz kardan) about this. In this essay I am going to discussed about whether this phenomenal is justified or not, and is there any alternative for this.
Whether we like it or not great deal of our needs are provided by destroying wild life. It's not just about the experiments on animals, our food, clothes and big deal of livelihood is depends on animals and sacrificing their lives, this is just human nature. I am not saying that is fair for us to destroy some other creatures, what I am saying is that if we decide that is not justified for humans to overuse wildlife it should be implemented in larger scale. And since there has not been any movement toward this and it has not even been mentioned, at least not in big communities, there is no point of just forbidding animal experiments. If we care we should care truly.
But are there any alternatives for animal experiments? It really depends on the usecase, in some cases it is possible to test a functionality of some inventions in other ways than experimenting on animals, but I believe sometimes this is not the case, and by not experimenting products on animals we are committing to sacrifice human lives instead.
I believe and confirm that it is crucial to do experiments on animals without knowing what kind of results it might have on their lives and how difficult and painful it is going to be for them, but considering what I have mentioned in this essay, I think it is justified for the experiments that have no alternative test cases other than animals to experiment on them.
It is not deniable that with the extent of industrial needs,
experiments
on
animals
have increased
greatly
and it has become one of the serious environmental communities concerns, and I believe there have been
some
movemenents
in regard of(?
)
complaining(?
eteraz
kardan
) about this. In this essay I am going to
discussed about whether
this phenomenal
is justified
or not, and is there any alternative for this.
Whether we like it or not great deal of our needs
are provided
by destroying wild life. It's not
just
about the
experiments
on
animals
, our food, clothes and
big
deal of livelihood is depends on
animals
and sacrificing their
lives
, this is
just
human nature. I am not saying
that is
fair
for us to
destroy
some
other creatures, what I am saying is that if we decide
that is
not justified for humans to overuse wildlife it should
be implemented
in larger scale. And since there has not been any movement toward this and it has not even
been mentioned
, at least not in
big
communities, there is no point of
just
forbidding
animal
experiments
.
If
we care we should care
truly
.
But
are there any alternatives for
animal
experiments
? It
really
depends on the
usecase
, in
some
cases it is possible to
test
a functionality of
some
inventions in other ways than experimenting on
animals
,
but
I believe
sometimes
this is not the case, and by not experimenting products on
animals
we are committing to sacrifice human
lives
instead
.
I believe and confirm that it is crucial to do
experiments
on
animals
without knowing what kind of results it might have on their
lives
and how difficult and painful it is going to be for them,
but
considering what I have mentioned in this essay, I
think
it
is justified
for the
experiments
that have no alternative
test
cases other than
animals
to
experiment
on them.