With globalisation comes an almost inevitable joining together of cultures, experiences and languages. One of the consequences of this is that a great many lesser-spoken languages are dying, as they are no longer required in the context of the modern world. This could be either be seen as a positive or a negative, depending on whether a business or a cultural view is taken.
From a business perspective, moving towards a singular international language is not only sensible but has in fact already begun. International trade and diplomatic relations are just two key areas that are made easier without a language barrier, and English has already positioned itself as the world’s leading language in these areas. The potential for misunderstanding and misrepresentation is dramatically lowered, and this extends to the public in general, with holidays and wider social communication made all the more possible by a singular, shared language.
On the other hand, culture and tradition are rooted within language. To lose one’s national tongue could be seen as losing one’s identity. If this happens, it could cause no small amount of resentment, in particular towards nations that speak the chosen international language as their first. This could actually lead to diplomatic issues rather than solutions, which is precisely what globalisation is seeking to reduce.
In conclusion, while I am entirely in favour of closer diplomatic relations between countries, I strongly believe that it is extremely important that traditional values and cultures are upheld. Seeing as I am convinced that language and culture are inseparable, I disagree with the idea that life would be better with fewer languages in the world.
With
globalisation
comes
an almost inevitable joining together of
cultures
, experiences and
languages
. One of the consequences of this is that a great
many
lesser-spoken
languages
are dying, as they are no longer required in the context of the modern world. This could be either be
seen
as a
positive
or a
negative
, depending on whether a business or a cultural view
is taken
.
From a business perspective, moving towards a singular international
language
is not
only
sensible
but
has in fact already begun. International trade and diplomatic relations are
just
two key areas that
are made
easier without a
language
barrier, and English has already positioned itself as the world’s leading
language
in these areas. The potential for misunderstanding and misrepresentation is
dramatically
lowered, and this extends to the public
in general
, with holidays and wider social communication made all the more possible by a singular, shared language.
On the other hand
,
culture
and tradition
are rooted
within
language
. To lose one’s national tongue could be
seen
as losing one’s identity. If this happens, it could cause no
small
amount of resentment,
in particular
towards nations that speak the chosen international
language
as their
first
. This could actually lead to diplomatic issues
rather
than solutions, which is
precisely
what
globalisation
is seeking to
reduce
.
In conclusion
, while I am
entirely
in
favour
of closer diplomatic relations between countries, I
strongly
believe that it is
extremely
important
that traditional values and
cultures
are upheld
. Seeing as I
am convinced
that
language
and
culture
are inseparable, I disagree with the
idea
that life would be better with fewer
languages
in the world.