Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.
Check Your Text it's free

Evaluate the effectiveness of the two interviews.

Evaluate the effectiveness of the two interviews. 9lVG3
The first interview of the day was attempted by applicant 1 (John Smith). The applicant was completely unclear about the criteria for this job and interview. His answer delivery is not competent as he is not giving any sort of eye contact, body language and posture. First impressions are unsatisfactory this includes dress code, self-introduction, continuous fidgeting, and unprepared structure. Shows no big interest in a vet clinic environment, displays unrequited strengthen especially relating to studies and others. When asked to identify a time when completing multiple tasks in a short period of time, states “always working with multiple tasks in a short period of time”, instantly proves is disorganized. Clearly is unable to attain teamwork or work management as stated in the interview. Overall, not paying attention to answer delivery. Fulfilling answers in a disorder and explaining unrelated topics. Showing no leadership qualities and or relevance to work experience. Disappointing attitude and unsuccessful candidate for the job. The second interview was attempted by applicant 2. First impressions are exceptional this includes dress code, manners, and posture. Evidently presents self-introduction, clearly outlines his goals/future plans and reason for employment. Continuously uses hand gestures revealing strong communication skills and confidence. Explains relation to animals and environment instantly sharing experience. Strengths are explained in detail, highlighting organizational and attention to detail skills. Outlines weakness with assurance but assures his given skills and preparation will do the job. Hands team conflict and work pressure accurately according to his experience. Overall, a satisfactory applicant who is clearly capable of the internship. In conclusion, the candidate who is most compatible for the internship is applicant 2. As a result, he has performed the interview with high confidence and great initiative. In addition to meeting the satisfactory criteria, he provides examples of past successes in applying leadership skills and implementing major change initiatives.
The
first
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
interview
of the day
was attempted
by
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
applicant
1 (John Smith). The
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
applicant
was completely unclear about the criteria for this job and
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
interview
. His answer delivery is not competent as he is not giving any sort of eye contact, body language and posture.
First
impressions are unsatisfactory this includes dress code, self-introduction, continuous fidgeting, and unprepared structure.
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
Shows
no
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
big
interest in a vet clinic environment, displays unrequited strengthen
especially
relating to studies
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
and others
. When asked to identify a time when completing multiple tasks in a short period of time, states “always working with multiple tasks in a short period of time”,
instantly
proves
is disorganized
.
Clearly
is unable to attain teamwork or work management as stated in the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
interview
.
Overall
, not paying attention to answer delivery. Fulfilling answers in a disorder and explaining unrelated topics. Showing no leadership qualities and or relevance to work experience. Disappointing attitude and unsuccessful candidate for the job.

The second
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
interview
was attempted
by
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
applicant
2.
First
impressions are exceptional this includes dress code, manners, and posture.
Evidently
presents self-introduction,
clearly
outlines his goals/future plans and reason for employment.
Continuously
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
uses
hand gestures revealing strong communication
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
skills
and confidence.
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
Explains
relation to animals and environment
instantly
sharing experience. Strengths are
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
explained
in detail, highlighting organizational and attention to detail
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
skills
. Outlines weakness with assurance
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
but
assures his
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
given
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
skills
and preparation will do the job. Hands team conflict and work pressure
accurately
according to his experience.
Overall
, a satisfactory
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
applicant
who is
clearly
capable of the internship.

In conclusion
, the candidate who is most compatible for the internship is
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
applicant
2.
As a result
, he has performed the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
interview
with high confidence and great initiative.
In addition
to meeting the satisfactory criteria, he provides examples of past successes in applying leadership
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
skills
and implementing major
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
change
initiatives.
What do you think?
  • This is funny writingFunny
  • I love this writingLove
  • This writing has blown my mindWow
  • It made me angryAngry
  • It made me sadSad

IELTS essay Evaluate the effectiveness of the two interviews.

Essay
  American English
3 paragraphs
307 words
6.0
Overall Band Score
Coherence and Cohesion: 5.0
  • Structure your answers in logical paragraphs
  • ?
    One main idea per paragraph
  • Include an introduction and conclusion
  • Support main points with an explanation and then an example
  • Use cohesive linking words accurately and appropriately
  • Vary your linking phrases using synonyms
Lexical Resource: 5.5
  • Try to vary your vocabulary using accurate synonyms
  • Use less common question specific words that accurately convey meaning
  • Check your work for spelling and word formation mistakes
Grammatical Range: 6.5
  • Use a variety of complex and simple sentences
  • Check your writing for errors
Task Achievement: 6.0
  • Answer all parts of the question
  • ?
    Present relevant ideas
  • Fully explain these ideas
  • Support ideas with relevant, specific examples
Labels Descriptions
  • ?
    Currently is not available
  • Meet the criteria
  • Doesn't meet the criteria
Recent posts