Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.
Check Your Text it's free

Ethanol is not a good replacement for gasoline.

Ethanol is not a good replacement for gasoline. bYoRP
The lecturer disputes the idea presented in the reading that ethanol cannot be an alternative source of energy to gasoline. He asserts that ethanol has some advantages over gasoline in terms of being environmentally friendly substance. and does not cause a scarce in food supply to animals, so he refutes each claim presented by the author. First, the lecturer argues that plants that produces ethanol reduces the greenhouse effect. The author claims that ethanol causes global warming because the extraction process results in an increase in temperature. However, the lecturer suggests that ethanol cannot have such effect because the producing plants consumes carbon dioxide from air and releases oxygen, which in turn, causes a reduction in the continuous increase in temperature on the surface of the earth. Secondly, the lecturer states that using large amounts of plants to extract ethanol does not cause a reduction in food supply to animals. The author posits that extracting ethanol plants causes animal hunger because no food would become available for animals. However, the lecturer contends not all parts of the plant is needed to extract ethanol but, Specifically, the part which contains cellulose cellulose is the one needed. Thus, extraction of ethanol from plants does not tremendously affect the food supply to animals because animals does not eat the cellulose part of the plant. Finally, the lecturer states that the cost of producing ethanol is not a big concern. The author claims that using ethanol instead of gasoline for energy supply is a costly option. On the other hand, The lecturer states that even though the cost of extracting ethanol is expensive at the moment, It is most likely to decrease once production increases. For instance, a three fold increase in production of ethanol for energy would result in a 40% reduction in price. Thus, the extraction of ethanol would not only be feasible, but also economical.
The
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
lecturer
disputes the
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
idea
presented in the reading that
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
ethanol
cannot be an alternative source of energy to gasoline. He asserts that
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
ethanol
has
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
some
advantages over gasoline in terms of being
environmentally
friendly substance.
This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
and
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
does
not
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
cause
a scarce in
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
food
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
supply
to
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
animals
,
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
so
he refutes each claim presented by the author.

First
, the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
lecturer
argues that
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
plants
that produces
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
ethanol
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
reduces
the greenhouse effect. The author claims that
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
ethanol
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
causes
global warming
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
because
the extraction process results in an
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
increase
in temperature.
However
, the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
lecturer
suggests that
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
ethanol
cannot have such effect
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
because
the producing
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
plants
consumes carbon dioxide from air and releases oxygen, which in turn,
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
causes
a reduction in the continuous
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
increase
in temperature on the surface of the earth.

Secondly
, the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
lecturer
states that using large amounts of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
plants
to extract
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
ethanol
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
does
not
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
cause
a reduction in
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
food
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
supply
to
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
animals
. The author posits that extracting
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
ethanol
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
plants
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
causes
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
animal
hunger
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
because
no
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
food
would become available for
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
animals
.
However
, the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
lecturer
contends not all parts of the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
plant
is needed
to extract
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
ethanol
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
but
,
Specifically
, the part which contains
Possible typo: you repeated a word
cellulose cellulose
is the one needed.
Thus
, extraction of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
ethanol
from
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
plants
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
does
not
tremendously
affect the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
food
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
supply
to
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
animals
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
because
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
animals
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
does
not eat the cellulose part of the plant.

Finally
, the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
lecturer
states that the cost of producing
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
ethanol
is not a
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
big
concern. The author claims that using
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
ethanol
instead
of gasoline for energy
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
supply
is a costly option.
On the other hand
, The
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
lecturer
states that
even though
the cost of extracting
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
ethanol
is expensive at the moment, It is most likely to decrease once production
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
increases
.
For instance
, a
This expression is normally spelled as one or with hyphen.
three fold
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
increase
in production of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
ethanol
for energy would result in a 40% reduction in price.
Thus
, the extraction of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
ethanol
would not
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
only
be feasible,
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
but
also
economical.
What do you think?
  • This is funny writingFunny
  • I love this writingLove
  • This writing has blown my mindWow
  • It made me angryAngry
  • It made me sadSad

IELTS essay Ethanol is not a good replacement for gasoline.

Essay
  American English
4 paragraphs
314 words
5.5
Overall Band Score
Coherence and Cohesion: 5.5
  • Structure your answers in logical paragraphs
  • ?
    One main idea per paragraph
  • Include an introduction and conclusion
  • Support main points with an explanation and then an example
  • Use cohesive linking words accurately and appropriately
  • Vary your linking phrases using synonyms
Lexical Resource: 5.5
  • Try to vary your vocabulary using accurate synonyms
  • Use less common question specific words that accurately convey meaning
  • Check your work for spelling and word formation mistakes
Grammatical Range: 6.5
  • Use a variety of complex and simple sentences
  • Check your writing for errors
Task Achievement: 5.0
  • Answer all parts of the question
  • ?
    Present relevant ideas
  • Fully explain these ideas
  • Support ideas with relevant, specific examples
Labels Descriptions
  • ?
    Currently is not available
  • Meet the criteria
  • Doesn't meet the criteria
Recent posts





Get more results for topic:
  • Ethanol is not a good replacement for gasoline.