The article introduces the topic of energy sources one of which is the waveform of energy. The author writes that harnessing the power of ocean waves to store energy is a benefit compared to other sources of energy. The speaker disagrees with the writer’s statement and says that this method of storage has problems as the machinery used emits energies that aren't beneficial to the environment, the chemicals released are harmful to the ocean.
The writer tries to make his statement strong by saying that waveforms are better for the environment like wind and solar power. This form of energy does not release carbon dioxide and has no long-term damage to the environment. The professor strongly states the writer’s statement false as the machinery used releases some sort of chemicals into the ocean therefore they are dangerous.
The writer also says that the waveform is predictable and manageable which leads to steadiness and reliability of the source. However, the speaker says that being predictable doesn’t equate to reliability. He also says that the functionality of generators is harsh for the environment.
Lastly, the author says this form of energy is the least harmful to the ecosystem. The speaker on the other hand disagrees by saying, this system for storage is disrupted and dangerous, and it produces a lot of noise in the environment and also damages the sea creatures
The article introduces the topic of
energy
sources one of which is the waveform of
energy
. The author writes that harnessing the power of ocean waves to store
energy
is a benefit compared to other sources of
energy
.
The
speaker disagrees with the
writer’s
statement and
says
that this method of storage has problems as the machinery
used
emits
energies
that aren't beneficial to the
environment
, the chemicals released are harmful to the ocean.
The
writer
tries to
make
his statement strong by saying that waveforms are better for the
environment
like wind and solar power. This form of
energy
does not release carbon dioxide and has no long-term damage to the
environment
. The professor
strongly
states the
writer’s
statement false as the machinery
used
releases
some
sort of chemicals into the ocean
therefore
they are
dangerous
.
The
writer
also
says
that the waveform is predictable and manageable which leads to steadiness and reliability of the source.
However
, the speaker
says
that being predictable doesn’t equate to reliability. He
also
says
that the functionality of generators is harsh for the environment.
Lastly
, the author
says
this form of
energy
is the least harmful to the ecosystem. The speaker
on the other hand
disagrees by saying, this system for storage
is disrupted
and
dangerous
, and it produces
a lot of
noise in the
environment
and
also
damages the sea
creatures