Opinions differ regarding whether potential employees’ personal information should be unraveled to recruiters. Although it is sometimes thought that personal data, such as marital status, interests, and passions can be of no use, others argue that, and I agree, it may benefit both the employer and the employee.
First and foremost, it is often believed that employees’ personal information would not be relevant. This is because the focus must be on the interviewees’ academic background and professional experience rather than what they enjoy doing in their leisure time, for example. Being informed about the employees’ marital status, for instance, would not serve the company’s manager since she will be evaluating the workers’ performance while doing certain tasks. If the recruiters learned about some confidential data of their prospect workers, they would have to take it into account during certain circumstances.
However, some argue that sharing one ‘s personal information with one possible employer has the potential of benefiting both the company and its employees, and I side with this view. Once the company is aware of its workers' personal preferences, such as free time passions, it stands high chances of catering for both the workers’ needs and wants. To make it clearer, a married person may have to take care of their sick child or spouse, thus the company will be prepared for such emergencies. Learning that a certain group of personnel enjoy playing football, for example, the company might organize certain competitions which would, accordingly, increase the workers’ productivity. Had they not known about their passions, the employers may not have been that considerate.
In conclusion, although people’s views may vary, I believe that being knowledgeable about one’s employees’ private information can help both the company and the workers on the basis of promoting the employees’ productivity.
Opinions differ regarding whether potential
employees’
personal
information
should
be unraveled
to recruiters. Although it is
sometimes
thought
that
personal
data, such as marital status, interests, and passions can be of no
use
, others argue that, and I
agree
, it may benefit both the employer and the employee.
First
and foremost, it is
often
believed that
employees’
personal
information
would not be relevant. This is
because
the focus
must
be on the interviewees’ academic background and professional experience
rather
than what they enjoy doing in their leisure time,
for example
.
Being informed
about the
employees’
marital status,
for instance
, would not serve the
company’s
manager since she will be evaluating the
workers’
performance while doing
certain
tasks. If the recruiters learned about
some
confidential data of their prospect
workers
, they would
have to
take it into account during
certain
circumstances.
However
,
some
argue that sharing one ‘s
personal
information
with one possible employer has the potential of benefiting both the
company
and its
employees
, and I side with this view. Once the
company
is aware of its workers'
personal
preferences, such as free time passions, it stands high chances of catering for both the
workers’
needs and wants. To
make
it clearer, a married person may
have to
take care of their sick child or spouse,
thus
the
company
will
be prepared
for such emergencies. Learning that a
certain
group of personnel enjoy playing football,
for example
, the
company
might organize
certain
competitions which would,
accordingly
, increase the
workers’
productivity. Had they not known about their passions, the employers may not have been that considerate.
In conclusion
, although
people
’s views may vary, I believe that being knowledgeable about one’s
employees’
private
information
can
help
both the
company
and the
workers
on the basis of promoting the
employees’
productivity.