Education just like any other sector that may grow with good and healthy competition. In this case, I believe that both government and private institutes are equally essential and my views are discussed further.
Education is a basic human right, which must be free and accessible to all. Public schools have done a very good job in this as it provides free schooling. This greatly helps indigents who cannot afford the costly fees of private ones. Because of commercialization, there is a drastic upsurge of privately-owned institutions. Furthermore, they focus more on results rather than on moral and ethical knowledge. Their main goal is to boost the top students' performance on big hoardings so that it can increase its profits and have the upper hand in the market. Whereas, earlier ones promote indoctrination over anything else.
United Nations recommends that each country should invest at least 5% of their gross domestic product in literacy. Unfortunately, many developing and under-developed countries are not able to afford it. Hence, we see that many state-owned academies have very poor infrastructure. It has unhealthy toilets and drinking water, unqualified teachers, and the quality of learning is substandard. In contrast, later ones have up-to-date technological tools. Even though it is costly it may sometimes provide better opportunities to students. Sadly, this increases the disparity between affluent and poverty-stricken.
In conclusion, one cannot expect an officially elected authority to devote all the money to learning since it has other major responsibilities too. Therefore, non-public is beneficial to fill that gap.
Education
just
like any other sector that may grow with
good
and healthy competition.
In this case
, I believe that both
government
and private institutes are
equally
essential and my views
are discussed
further
.
Education is a basic human right, which
must
be free and accessible to all. Public schools have done a
very
good
job in this as it provides free schooling. This
greatly
helps
indigents who cannot afford the costly fees of private
ones
.
Because
of commercialization, there is a drastic upsurge of
privately
-
owned
institutions.
Furthermore
, they focus more on results
rather
than on moral and ethical knowledge. Their main goal is to boost the top students' performance on
big
hoardings
so
that it can increase its profits and have the upper hand in the market.
Whereas
, earlier
ones
promote indoctrination over anything else.
United Nations recommends that each country should invest at least 5% of their gross domestic product in literacy. Unfortunately,
many
developing and under-
developed countries
are not able to afford it.
Hence
, we
see
that
many
state-
owned
academies have
very
poor infrastructure. It has unhealthy toilets and drinking water, unqualified teachers, and the quality of learning is substandard.
In contrast
, later
ones
have up-to-date technological tools.
Even though
it is costly it may
sometimes
provide better opportunities to students.
Sadly
, this increases the disparity between affluent and poverty-stricken.
In conclusion
, one cannot
expect
an
officially
elected authority to devote all the money to learning since it has other major responsibilities too.
Therefore
, non-public is beneficial to fill that gap.