Search
Vocabularying
Listening
Reading
1. Academic
2. General
Writing
1. IELTSWriting Checker
2. IELTS Writing Samples
Speaking

Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.

Drug testing on animal should be banned or not . How far you agree or disagree?

Drug testing on animal should be banned or not. How far you agree or disagree? qVaEp

Animal experimentation has been a debated issue for many decades. It is true that medicines and other daily products are tested on animals before they are cleared for human use. However, it is often suggested that medical experiments should not conduct on animals. I agree with statement yet some conservative swing in the opposite direction. I will elaborate my opinion in the upcoming paragraphs. To embark upon, the most convincing argument in the favour of this claim is animals also have rights. Needless to say, just like humans, animals also have their rights. Animal testing does not mean it is 100% safe for human then why animals are often killed for testing as well as they are frequently suffering from extreme pain. Moreover, the benefits to humans do not justify the suffering caused and the scientist should use alternative methods for research. On the other hand, there is no other alternative to check the effectiveness of drugs and human life is more precious than animals that are why no country allows to direct test on the humanity. In addition, it is reasonable to put life of some animals at risk to save lives of the masses. In conclusion, I am of the opinion, on balance, that the benefits do not outweigh the disadvantages, and testing on animals should not continue. Although it may improve the lives of humans, it is not fair that animals should suffer in order to achieve this.

You use this word too often, consider replacing it withnaturalbodily
Animal
 experimentation has been a debated issue for This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:a plethora ofa number ofnumerous
many
 decades. It is true that medicines and other daily products are This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :evaluated
tested
 on You use this word too often, consider replacing it withpetbeastcreature
animals
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:previouslyprior to
before
 they are cleared
 for You use this word too often, consider replacing it withpersonalanimalmortal
human
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :exploit
use
. However
, it is This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:frequently
often
 suggested that medical experiments should not conduct on You use this word too often, consider replacing it withpetbeastcreature
animals
. I This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :acquiesce
agree
 with statement yet
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:a number of
some
 conservative swing in the opposite direction. I will elaborate my opinion in the upcoming paragraphs.

To embark upon, the most convincing argument in the Possible spelling mistake. 'favour' is British English.favor
favour
 of this claim is You use this word too often, consider replacing it withpetbeastcreature
animals
also
 have rights. Needless to say, This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:merely
just
 like You use this word too often, consider replacing it withbodylifemortalcharacterindividualchild
humans
, You use this word too often, consider replacing it withpetbeastcreature
animals
also
 have their rights. You use this word too often, consider replacing it withnaturalbodily
Animal
 testing does not mean it is 100% safe for You use this word too often, consider replacing it withpersonalanimalmortal
human
 then why You use this word too often, consider replacing it withpetbeastcreature
animals
 are This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:frequently
often
 killed for testing as well
 as they are frequently
 suffering from extreme pain. Moreover
, the benefits to You use this word too often, consider replacing it withbodylifemortalcharacterindividualchild
humans
 do not justify the suffering caused and the scientist should This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :exploit
use
 alternative methods for research.

On the other hand
, there is no other alternative to This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :monitor
check
 the effectiveness of drugs and You use this word too often, consider replacing it withpersonalanimalmortal
human
 life is more precious than You use this word too often, consider replacing it withpetbeastcreature
animals
 that are why no country This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :authorizes
allows
 to direct This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :evaluate
test
 on the humanity. In addition
, it is reasonable to put life of This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:a number of
some
You use this word too often, consider replacing it withpetbeastcreature
animals
 at This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :hazarddanger
risk
 to save This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :resides
lives
 of the masses.

In conclusion
, I am of the opinion, on balance, that the benefits do not outweigh the disadvantages, and testing on You use this word too often, consider replacing it withpetbeastcreature
animals
 should not continue. Although it may This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :ameliorate
improve
 the This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :resides
lives
 of You use this word too often, consider replacing it withbodylifemortalcharacterindividualchild
humans
, it is not This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :equitable
fair
 that You use this word too often, consider replacing it withpetbeastcreature
animals
 should suffer in order to achieve this. 