Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.
Check Your Text it's free

Do you think scientists should be given the freedom to test and experiment however they please or should they be limited in what they can study Give reasons and examples to support your opinion

Do you think scientists should be given the freedom to test and experiment however they please or should they be limited in what they can study Give reasons and examples to support your opinion Dl3D6
Scientific experiments are making science’s knowledge progressing day after day. However, opinions about the freedom of scientists is divided in two. Thus who thinks that scientist should have the liberty to do whatever they want in the name of science progress, other thinks that scientists’ studies should be structured. To me, scientist’s freedom of experiment should be limited because of ethic issues and in a concern of effectiveness. First, Scientific’s studies should be ethically acceptable. Actually, if an experiment will harm the subject (humans and animals) psychologically or physically, the study must not continue. Humans and animals are living, they have dignity. In this respect, you can not treat them as laboratory objects. For instance, if a scientist want to be sure and precise about the psychological factor that influence our life, he can make a psychological experiment on babies. Nevertheless, it will be completely unethical to reproduce abandon on purpose to a baby and see him growing, just to measure the effect. Second, if scientists can conduct whatever studies they want, studies risk to not be efficient. In other words, if scientist on a same field do not agree on a couple of specific experiment to do there will be not enough financial support to maintain all of them, especially if there is no need. For example, if there is a need to experiment on Ebola disease but none scientist want to study on it, people are going to die because this disease is spreading now. Furthermore, there will not be enough money to conduct the experiment.
Scientific
experiments
are making science’s knowledge progressing day after day.
However
, opinions about the freedom of
scientists
is divided
in two.
Thus
who
thinks
that
scientist
should have the liberty to do whatever they
want
in the name of science progress, other
thinks
that
scientists’
studies
should
be structured
. To me,
scientist’s
freedom of
experiment
should
be limited
because
of ethic issues and in a concern of effectiveness.

First
, Scientific’s
studies
should be
ethically
acceptable. Actually, if an
experiment
will harm the subject (humans and animals)
psychologically
or
physically
, the
study
must
not continue. Humans and animals are living, they have dignity. In this respect, you can not treat them as laboratory objects.
For instance
, if a
scientist
want
to be sure and precise about the psychological factor that influence our life, he can
make
a psychological
experiment
on babies.
Nevertheless
, it will be completely unethical to reproduce abandon on purpose to a baby and
see
him growing,
just
to measure the effect.

Second, if
scientists
can conduct whatever
studies
they
want
,
studies
risk
to not be efficient.
In other words
, if
scientist
on a same field do not
agree
on a couple of specific
experiment
to do there will be not
enough
financial support to maintain all of them,
especially
if there is no need.
For example
, if there is a need to
experiment
on Ebola disease
but
none
scientist
want
to
study
on it,
people
are going to
die
because
this disease is spreading
now
.
Furthermore
, there will not be
enough
money to conduct the
experiment
.

IELTS essay Do you think scientists should be given the freedom to test and experiment however they please or should they be limited in what they can study Give reasons and examples to support your opinion

Essay
  American English
3 paragraphs
258 words
6.0
Overall Band Score
Coherence and Cohesion: 5.5
  • Structure your answers in logical paragraphs
  • ?
    One main idea per paragraph
  • Include an introduction and conclusion
  • Support main points with an explanation and then an example
  • Use cohesive linking words accurately and appropriately
  • Vary your linking phrases using synonyms
Lexical Resource: 5.5
  • Try to vary your vocabulary using accurate synonyms
  • Use less common question specific words that accurately convey meaning
  • Check your work for spelling and word formation mistakes
Grammatical Range: 6.5
  • Use a variety of complex and simple sentences
  • Check your writing for errors
Task Achievement: 7.0
  • Answer all parts of the question
  • ?
    Present relevant ideas
  • Fully explain these ideas
  • Support ideas with relevant, specific examples
Labels Descriptions
  • ?
    Currently is not available
  • Meet the criteria
  • Doesn't meet the criteria
Recent posts
  • Family is the core of our lives.
    Family is the core of our lives. It is the trigger of the most sincere feelings. Consequently the members of the family are having great impact on each other. Another definition of family is our circle of friends, which also contains the action of having impacts on one another. Although I am quite a...
  • People are curious creatures.
    People are curious creatures. So, to satisfy their curiosity, people started to develop and eventually invented schools and universities to enable everyone to get education. Despite the fact that a lot of people believe that learning and remembering information is the most important part of educatio...
  • Violence on TV What is your opinion
    Many of us claim that growing violence on TV and in computer games spread aggression on people, while others argue that this type of entertainment has positive impact on people’s lifestyle. I’m inclined to believe that Tv and computer games’ violence does not affect people’s behavior. First and for...
  • Soem peole
    It is commonly said that parents should put limitations on playing computer games and watching television for their children, engaging them to read more books. In this essay I agree with that notion and in my opinion, books are more beneficial for children than the electronic devices. On the one ha...
  • Traditional Vs Modern housing
    East or West, home is the best. Whether your house is an old, traditional one, or a modern, big house, It will be the best for you. However, given the choice, I would prefer to live in a contemporary one. This is because modern houses are more convenient and require better quality of everyday life. ...
  • Fulfilling our needs and desires make our lives better and satisfies our comfort zone.
    Fulfilling our needs and desires make our lives better and satisfies our comfort zone. However, we sometimes face the issue of doing the things which we do not really favor. As living in a communal world we definitely have to complete unfavorable tasks. I feel this way for personal and social reason...





Get more results for topic: