Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.
Check Your Text it's free

Do You think business should hire employee who will spend their entire lives working for the company Do you agree or disagree

Do You think business should hire employee who will spend their entire lives working for the company LQWK
Business operates based on number of resources and workers are considered as key resource. Most employers tend to hire people, who are willing to be associated for longer duration. This practice is highly debatable, if employer’s or employees beneficial through this trend? I would like to lean towards former since employer’s profit more. Nevertheless, many workers are affected both economically and psychologically in this practice. This essay would discuss on the disagreement towards the thought of recruiting workers who could dedicate their life span working for one company. Because of long-term employees, business can reduce the time and cost on training new recruits. Most employers claim that spending on training new employees is a heavy expense. In addition, experienced labors can produce quality with limited errors. To prove this, Older employees are masters of their work since they have been performing the task for ages. Due to long-term relationship between the workers and business, trust is created. Despite these benefits to the company, we need to verify if this method has positive impact on employees as individuals. In this Changing world, It is natural that the likeness and interest towards the job and the company can switch. Though experienced employees can be masters, there chances of performing dissatisfied job. Actioning the same job at the same place for years can make them feel monotonous. Consequently, these workers will not upgrade or enhance their skills which would affect their career. For instance: if the company locks down, these employees will not have enough skills to match the current market. Most people would say that experienced workers enjoy plethora of benefits in their company while, their salary remains the same. In my perspective, workers have right to choose if they want to stay or leave. All in all, it is important to plan the business therefore, it is profitable. I strongly disagree on the statement to hire people, those who commit their whole life working. In fact, this thought needs to abolish, since we need to consider individuals as humans and learn to empathize their wants. If companies hire labors for entire life eventually, there will be no opportunities for young people
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
Business
operates based on number of resources and
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
workers
are considered
as key resource. Most
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
employers
tend to hire
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
people
, who are willing to
be associated
for longer duration. This practice is
highly
debatable, if
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
employer’s
or
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
employees
beneficial through this trend? I would like to lean towards former since
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
employer’s
profit more.
Nevertheless
,
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
many
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
workers
are
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
affected
both
economically
and
psychologically
in this practice. This essay would discuss on the disagreement towards the
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
thought
of recruiting
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
workers
who could dedicate their life span working for one
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
company
.

This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
Because
of long-term
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
employees
,
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
business
can
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
reduce
the time and cost on training new recruits. Most
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
employers
claim that spending on training new
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
employees
is a heavy expense.
In addition
, experienced labors can produce quality with limited errors. To prove this, Older
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
employees
are masters of their work since they have been performing the task for ages. Due to long-term relationship between the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
workers
and
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
business
, trust
is created
. Despite these benefits to the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
company
, we need to verify if this method has
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
positive
impact on
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
employees
as individuals.

In this Changing world, It is natural that the likeness and interest towards the job and the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
company
can switch. Though experienced
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
employees
can be masters, there chances of performing dissatisfied job. Actioning the same job at the same place for years can
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
make
them feel monotonous.
Consequently
, these
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
workers
will not upgrade or enhance their
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
skills
which would affect their career.
For instance
: if the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
company
locks down, these
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
employees
will not have
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
enough
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
skills
to match the
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
current
market. Most
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
people
would say that experienced
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
workers
enjoy plethora of benefits in their
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
company
while, their salary remains the same. In my perspective,
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
workers
have right to choose if they want to stay or
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
leave
.

All in all, it is
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
important
to plan the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
business
therefore
, it is profitable. I
strongly
disagree on the statement to hire
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
people
, those who commit their whole life working. In fact, this
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
thought
needs to abolish, since we need to consider individuals as humans and learn to empathize their wants. If
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
companies
hire labors for entire life
eventually
, there will be no opportunities for young
Please add a punctuation mark at the end of paragraph
people
What do you think?
  • This is funny writingFunny
  • I love this writingLove
  • This writing has blown my mindWow
  • It made me angryAngry
  • It made me sadSad

IELTS essay Do You think business should hire employee who will spend their entire lives working for the company

Essay
  American English
4 paragraphs
359 words
6.0
Overall Band Score
Coherence and Cohesion: 5.5
  • Structure your answers in logical paragraphs
  • ?
    One main idea per paragraph
  • Include an introduction and conclusion
  • Support main points with an explanation and then an example
  • Use cohesive linking words accurately and appropriately
  • Vary your linking phrases using synonyms
Lexical Resource: 5.5
  • Try to vary your vocabulary using accurate synonyms
  • Use less common question specific words that accurately convey meaning
  • Check your work for spelling and word formation mistakes
Grammatical Range: 6.5
  • Use a variety of complex and simple sentences
  • Check your writing for errors
Task Achievement: 7.0
  • Answer all parts of the question
  • ?
    Present relevant ideas
  • Fully explain these ideas
  • Support ideas with relevant, specific examples
Labels Descriptions
  • ?
    Currently is not available
  • Meet the criteria
  • Doesn't meet the criteria
Recent posts