People hold different views about whether there should be more or less control over children. While there are some strong arguments against the setting of children’s strict controls, I believe that children need the high standards of discipline.
There are several reasons why people might argue that children should not be controlled strictly. Firstly, children will have confidence in themselves in the future if they do not have to reluctantly obey certain kinds of rules. For example, giving freedom from too many strict regulations at school assists them to take an active involvement in lessons. Secondly, not having to follow orders helps them to have much success in their higher education. More importantly, it is beneficial for them to develop an independent study habit which prepares them to work autonomously.
However, I would agree with those who believe that it is significant to sufficiently regulate those children who are concerned. The main reason for this view is that having such kinds of ground rules teaches youngsters to feel a strong sense of responsibility towards their future life. For instance, they always tend to do something to improve their life-long experience instead of wasting their valuable time. Another factor for this opinion is that carefully regulated children will probably make a success in their workplaces such as career progression and job prospects in their later life.
In conclusion, although there are clear arguments against supervising children amply, I am of the opinion that complying with significant rules is a necessary burden.
People
hold
different
views about whether there should be more or less control over
children
. While there are
some
strong arguments against the setting of
children’s
strict controls, I believe that
children
need the high standards of discipline.
There are several reasons why
people
might argue that
children
should not
be controlled
strictly
.
Firstly
,
children
will have confidence in themselves in the future if they do not
have to
reluctantly
obey certain kinds of
rules
.
For example
, giving freedom from too
many
strict regulations at school assists them to take an active involvement in lessons.
Secondly
, not having to follow orders
helps
them to have much success in their higher education. More
importantly
, it is beneficial for them to develop an independent study habit which prepares them to work
autonomously
.
However
, I would
agree
with those who believe that it is significant to
sufficiently
regulate those
children
who
are concerned
. The main reason for this view is that having such kinds of ground
rules
teaches youngsters to feel a strong sense of responsibility towards their future life.
For instance
, they always tend to do something to
improve
their life-long experience
instead
of wasting their valuable time. Another factor for this opinion is that
carefully
regulated
children
will
probably
make
a success in their workplaces such as career progression and job prospects in their later life.
In conclusion
, although there are
clear
arguments against supervising
children
amply
, I am of the opinion that complying with significant
rules
is a necessary burden.