The reading passage described about the Turing test created by Alan Turing. The goal of the test is to find the answer that whether the computer can think. In the process of the test experiment, a person is requested to ask questions to something in another room via speaking into a computer microphone or typing onto a computer screen. After they receive the answers on a computer screen or a computer voice, a person is required to indicate that they interact with a person or a computer. If a person unable to identify the difference or believes that the computer is a person, it means that computer can think. Nevertheless, no any computer overcomes the test since today.
The lecturer provided the contrast view derived from one philosopher that the Turing test measures the behaviors of a computer rather than its thoughts. The computers have processing systems which are designed for processing inputs and providing outputs or answers. However, in this process, the computers do not know the meaning of the processes and the results they gave. Thus, even though a computer able to respond to a person correctly in the process of Turing test, it does not mean that the computer can think. It just acts correctly.
According to the lecturer, the philosopher supported his argument by mentioning the Chinese room scenario. The scenario refers to the communication between an English-speaking person and a Chinese-speaking person. In this case, the former person cannot understand the meaning of the questions provided by the latter person. However, without understanding, the English-speaking person can guess and pick up the characters for answering the questions correctly, if he or she has large comprehensive reference about Chinese characters.
According to the lecture, the Turing test cannot test the thinking ability of computers.
The reading passage
described
about the Turing
test
created by Alan Turing. The goal of the
test
is to find the answer that whether the computer can
think
. In the
process
of the
test
experiment, a
person
is requested
to ask questions to something in another room via speaking into a computer microphone or typing onto a computer screen. After they receive the answers on a computer screen or a computer voice, a
person
is required
to indicate that they interact with a
person
or a computer. If a
person
unable to identify the difference or believes that the computer is a
person
, it means that computer can
think
.
Nevertheless
,
no
any computer overcomes the
test
since
today
.
The lecturer provided the contrast view derived from one philosopher that the Turing
test
measures the behaviors of a computer
rather
than its thoughts. The computers have processing systems which
are designed
for processing inputs and providing outputs or answers.
However
, in this
process
, the computers do not know the meaning of the
processes
and the results they gave.
Thus
,
even though
a computer able to respond to a
person
correctly
in the
process
of Turing
test
, it does not mean that the computer can
think
. It
just
acts
correctly
.
According to the lecturer, the philosopher supported his argument by mentioning the Chinese room scenario. The scenario refers to the communication between an English-speaking
person
and a Chinese-speaking
person
.
In this case
, the former
person
cannot understand the meaning of the questions provided by the latter
person
.
However
, without understanding, the English-speaking
person
can guess and pick up the characters for answering the questions
correctly
, if he or she has large comprehensive reference about Chinese characters.
According to the lecture, the Turing
test
cannot
test
the thinking ability of computers.