Irrefutably, disruptions in classroom have an indelible effect on students’ academic performance. Many people argue that students who are disobedient and mischievous must be taught in separate classrooms away from obedient students. I vehemently disagree with this notion as separating students on the basis of their behaviour will just aggravate this problem.
There are multifarious reasons to strengthen my viewpoint. First, when students are streamed according to their behaviour, they are often stigmatised and even feel inferior to well-behaving students. Worse still, other students may refuse to interact with the ill-mannered students. Since intelligent students perform well in academics, they set a preconceived notion that socialising with less disciplined students will lower their grades. More worryingly, this will create animosity among two different sections and eventually ruin the atmosphere of the school.
Concomitantly, instead of separating sections of naughty and obedient student to limit distractions, disciplined students must set an example in front of their classmates and thus motivate them to show sincerity in classrooms. More importantly, children studying together can learn the art of collaboration and sharing. To illustrate, students with higher abilities can exchange their views with those who show less interest in studying. Consequently, this cooperation encourages students to study more and this will naturally help to maintain discipline in the classroom and limit disruption.
To conclude, I firmly reiterate that rather than separating sections of students on the basis of their level of discipline, teachers should encourage morally correct students to set an example in front of their classmates.
Irrefutably
, disruptions in classroom have an indelible effect on
students’
academic performance.
Many
people
argue that
students
who are disobedient and mischievous
must
be taught
in separate classrooms away from obedient
students
. I
vehemently
disagree with this notion as separating
students
on the basis of their
behaviour
will
just
aggravate this problem.
There are multifarious reasons to strengthen my viewpoint.
First
, when
students
are streamed
according to their
behaviour
, they are
often
stigmatised
and even feel inferior to well-behaving
students
. Worse
still
, other
students
may refuse to interact with the ill-mannered
students
. Since intelligent
students
perform well in academics, they set a preconceived notion that
socialising
with less disciplined
students
will lower their grades. More
worryingly
, this will create animosity among two
different
sections and
eventually
ruin the atmosphere of the school.
Concomitantly
,
instead
of separating sections of naughty and obedient
student
to limit distractions, disciplined
students
must
set an example in front of their classmates and
thus
motivate them to
show
sincerity in classrooms. More
importantly
, children studying together can learn the art of collaboration and sharing. To illustrate,
students
with higher abilities can exchange their views with those who
show
less interest in studying.
Consequently
, this cooperation encourages
students
to study more and this will
naturally
help
to maintain discipline in the classroom and limit disruption.
To conclude
, I
firmly
reiterate that
rather
than separating sections of
students
on the basis of their level of discipline, teachers should encourage
morally
correct
students
to set an example in front of their classmates.