It is a fact that bosses and top executives earn a substantially larger salary than other employee. They are also rewarded with better pay rises and bonuses. It can be argued that they deserve this money due to the fact that their role is considered to be more difficult yet this may not always be the case.
There is strong evidence to support the assertion that a huge salary attracts talented individuals. The level of income offered creates healthy competition and encourages possible management employees to try to reach their full potential. It also ensures that only the most qualified people apply for certain positions. Clearly the effort and intelligence needed to obtain the appropriate qualifications should be reflected in a person’s wages. In a similar manner however, consistent good work must be recognised irrespective of an employee’s position with financial incentives such as bonuses.
Conversely, a large salary or bonus does not necessarily mean that a manager or director is worthy of it. There are many examples in which an individual holds a high position due only to family connections. In the global market, such examples of nepotism do not help to further a company’s success. More importantly this could cause dissatisfaction amongst staff and reduce productivity in general. In order to ensure fairness and a more equal form of encouragement, a maximum wage should be established. This would stop extravagant and unwarranted salaries and pay rises being paid to managers and directors who have not ‘earned’ it. It also supports the idea that a large company does not succeed only because of its management. All employees within a big corporation have a important role and this should be rewarded equally.
To summarise, money is a powerful motivator. In order to use this tool properly, limits must be imposed on large companies to ensure that all staff members feel their work is rewarded appropriately. This would ultimately lead to an environment in which all talent is met with the same response.
It is a fact that bosses and top executives earn a
substantially
larger
salary
than other
employee
. They are
also
rewarded with better pay rises and bonuses. It can
be argued
that they deserve this money due to the fact that their role
is considered
to be more difficult
yet
this may not always be the case.
There is strong evidence to support the assertion that a huge
salary
attracts talented individuals. The level of income offered creates healthy competition and encourages possible management
employees
to try to reach their full potential. It
also
ensures that
only
the most qualified
people
apply for certain positions.
Clearly
the effort and intelligence needed to obtain the appropriate qualifications should
be reflected
in a person’s wages.
In a similar manner
however
, consistent
good
work
must
be
recognised
irrespective of an
employee’s
position with financial incentives such as bonuses.
Conversely
, a large
salary
or bonus does not
necessarily
mean that a manager or director is worthy of it. There are
many
examples in which an individual holds a high position due
only
to family connections. In the global market, such examples of nepotism do not
help
to
further
a
company
’s success. More
importantly
this could cause dissatisfaction amongst staff and
reduce
productivity
in general
. In order to ensure fairness and a more equal form of encouragement, a maximum wage should
be established
. This would
stop
extravagant and unwarranted
salaries
and pay rises
being paid
to managers and directors who have not ‘earned’ it. It
also
supports the
idea
that a large
company
does not succeed
only
because
of its management. All
employees
within a
big
corporation have
a
important
role and this should
be rewarded
equally
.
To
summarise
, money is a powerful motivator. In order to
use
this tool
properly
, limits
must
be imposed
on large
companies
to ensure that all staff members feel their work
is rewarded
appropriately
. This would
ultimately
lead to an environment in which all talent
is met
with the same response.