Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.
Check Your Text it's free

Coronavirus: A laboratory made virus

Coronavirus: A laboratory made virus yxaWP
In my opinion the statement is a Dialectic method because it stated there that some people are saying that coronavirus is intentionally built in a laboratory, while others say that we are now facing world war III and China was winning because all countries around the world are suffering from this virus. In the lecture, we can see the definition of dialectic method is somehow similar to debate but with a different concept because it excludes subjective elements like emotional appeal. Since the background of Coronavirus is quite questionable because China was the first country that made a vaccine it is not subjective because we can really conclude that something is fishy about this virus especially some experts said that this virus is not really related to the bat that they claimed the origin of the virus. However, a study about Coronavirus proved that this virus really came from the bat because there is a history of two major coronavirus outbreaks: SARS and MERS. That’s why we cannot say that this virus really came from the laboratory or this is a bioweapon, and we are facing world war III and China is winning. China is also one of the countries that are affected by this pandemic and they spend millions of dollars just to keep chinese people safe from the virus. So the assumption that others are claiming is purely an opinion because the science itself already proven that this outbreaks was naturally caused and not through the process of bioengineering.
In my opinion the statement is a Dialectic method
because
it stated there that
some
people
are saying that coronavirus is
intentionally
built in a laboratory, while others say that we are
now
facing world war III and China was winning
because
all countries around the world are suffering from this
virus
. In the lecture, we can
see
the definition of dialectic method is somehow similar to debate
but
with a
different
concept
because
it excludes subjective elements like emotional appeal. Since the background of Coronavirus is quite questionable
because
China was the
first
country that made a vaccine it is not subjective
because
we can
really
conclude that something is fishy about this
virus
especially
some
experts said that this
virus
is not
really
related to the bat that they claimed the origin of the virus.

However
, a study about Coronavirus proved that this
virus
really
came from the bat
because
there is a history of two major coronavirus outbreaks: SARS and MERS. That’s why we cannot say that this
virus
really
came from the laboratory or this is a bioweapon, and we are facing world war III and China is winning. China is
also
one of the countries that are
affected
by this
pandemic and
they spend millions of dollars
just
to
keep
chinese
people
safe from the
virus
.
So
the assumption that others are claiming is
purely
an opinion
because
the science itself already proven that
this
outbreaks was
naturally
caused and not through the process of
bioengineering
.
What do you think?
  • This is funny writingFunny
  • I love this writingLove
  • This writing has blown my mindWow
  • It made me angryAngry
  • It made me sadSad

IELTS essay Coronavirus: A laboratory made virus

Essay
  American English
2 paragraphs
251 words
5.5
Overall Band Score
Coherence and Cohesion: 5.5
  • Structure your answers in logical paragraphs
  • ?
    One main idea per paragraph
  • Include an introduction and conclusion
  • Support main points with an explanation and then an example
  • Use cohesive linking words accurately and appropriately
  • Vary your linking phrases using synonyms
Lexical Resource: 5.0
  • Try to vary your vocabulary using accurate synonyms
  • Use less common question specific words that accurately convey meaning
  • Check your work for spelling and word formation mistakes
Grammatical Range: 6.0
  • Use a variety of complex and simple sentences
  • Check your writing for errors
Task Achievement: 5.0
  • Answer all parts of the question
  • ?
    Present relevant ideas
  • Fully explain these ideas
  • Support ideas with relevant, specific examples
Labels Descriptions
  • ?
    Currently is not available
  • Meet the criteria
  • Doesn't meet the criteria
Recent posts