Nowadays, juveniles devote the majority of time watching their favourite TV shows, or cartoons. However, few factions of the society believe that the TV will never supersede books as a knowledge enhancement tool owing to which children have insufficient literacy skills today. I strongly agree with the notion and shall elucidate my views in the following essay.
First and foremost, the books are bombarded with a plethora of information. Hence, although the television acts as a primary source of entertainment for numerous offsprings and teenagers, it does not facilitate in-depth chapters and the stories that assists the child in attaining the relevant data alike theoretical knowledge. For instance, a child, who aims to become a doctor, can never qualify the medical entrance exam just by watching a TV series and improper theoretical guidance.
Moreover, the books help children to focus that is quite unusual in the case of television. This is because the hearing and watching ability at the same time breaks the juvenile's focus towards the primary topic. Indeed, books are silent tools that aid to increase their reading power enabling them to focus on a specific subject. For instance, a survey in the Oxford University, which is one of the top educational institutes, revealed that 78% of the kids were inclined towards the books to gain knowledge rather than TV as they found it to be a peaceful mode of study, and the TV sound acted as an impediment to focus hard.
To conclude, the argument that TV's can be supplemented with books certainly does not hold water. Needless to say, books are an indispensable source of information. They not only consist of massive amount of data, but also allows the child to highly concentrate. 
Nowadays, juveniles devote the majority of time watching their  
favourite
 TV  
shows
, or cartoons.  
However
, few factions of the society believe that the TV will never supersede  
books
 as a knowledge enhancement tool owing to which children have insufficient literacy  
skills
  today
. I  
strongly
  agree
 with the notion and shall elucidate my views in the following essay. 
First
 and foremost, the  
books
  are bombarded
 with a plethora of information.  
Hence
, although the television acts as a primary source of entertainment for numerous  
offsprings
 and  
teenagers
, it does not facilitate in-depth chapters and the stories that assists the child in attaining the relevant data alike theoretical knowledge.  
For instance
, a child, who aims to become a doctor, can never qualify the medical entrance exam  
just
 by watching a TV series and improper theoretical guidance. 
Moreover
, the  
books
  help
 children to  
focus
  that is
 quite unusual in the case of television. This is  
because
 the hearing and watching ability at the same time breaks the juvenile's  
focus
 towards the primary topic.  
Indeed
,  
books
 are silent tools that aid to increase their reading power enabling them to  
focus
 on a specific subject.  
For instance
, a survey in the Oxford University, which is one of the top educational institutes, revealed that 78% of the kids  
were inclined
 towards the  
books
 to gain knowledge  
rather
 than TV as they found it to be a peaceful mode of study, and the TV sound acted as an impediment to  
focus
  hard
. 
To conclude
, the argument that TV's can  
be supplemented
 with  
books
  certainly
 does not hold water. Needless to say,  
books
 are an indispensable source of information. They not  
only
 consist of massive amount of data,  
but
  also
  allows
 the child to  
highly
 concentrate.