Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.
Check Your Text it's free

Changing jobs and residences frequently is a very common scenario nowdays. Do you believe that this is good for one's future?

Changing jobs and residences frequently is a very common scenario nowdays. Do you believe that this is good for one's future? PVRbE
Change seems to be the mood these days, in politics, economics, society, even personal life. Confirming the global tide of change, we shift our residencies, preferably moving from worse to better domiciles, and switch jobs for better pay and benefits. Some argue that keeping our lifestyle endangers our personal safety and personal stability. I also believe that despite the need for it only whenever the end result is fruitful, frequently forced changed is ailing more rather than helping. It is important that the idea of development is carefully distinguished from all arbitrary change. What is noticeable recently that the craze for abolishing all that is old for any that is new is rampant. In the job market, also, employees seem to be more restless, less patient of the due process of career progression. They fail, commonly to appreciate bureaucratic inertia that serves as a professional's nine-lives and misunderstand it as obstacle toward promotion. As a result employers are also becoming cynical of employees' commitment. This, as a whole, destabilizes the job market, which is favourable neither for the enterprise nor for the entrepreneurs and staffs. We are also facing this lack of commitments in residential communities. Before, a family would move into a neighborhood, socialize and localize themselves intimately for years, sometimes generations may develop a sense of mutual trustability with the local. Now, because of rampant migration from one locality to another, people are becoming strangers in their own alley. As a result, community support is diminishing every day, especially in urban areas, and families are transforming to estranged groups of people in an otherwise- crowded landscape. In conclusion, change is good as long as it is circumspect, however, change is bad whenever it is done just for the sake of it. Therefore, we must check the frequency of change, while keeping our minds open, and remember that all that we may perceive as old and used are also that we have to lose, which may very well be all that we have.
Change
seems to be the mood these days, in politics, economics, society, even personal life. Confirming the global tide of
change
, we shift our residencies,
preferably
moving from worse to better domiciles, and switch jobs for better pay and benefits.
Some
argue that keeping our lifestyle endangers our personal safety and personal stability. I
also
believe that despite the need for it
only
whenever the
end
result is fruitful,
frequently
forced
changed
is ailing more
rather
than helping.

It is
important
that the
idea
of development is
carefully
distinguished from all arbitrary
change
. What is noticeable recently that the craze for abolishing all
that is
old
for any
that is
new is rampant. In the job market,
also
, employees seem to be more restless, less patient of the due process of career progression. They fail,
commonly
to appreciate bureaucratic inertia that serves as a professional's nine-
lives
and misunderstand it as obstacle toward promotion.
As
a result employers are
also
becoming cynical of employees' commitment. This, as a whole, destabilizes the job market, which is
favourable
neither for the enterprise nor for the entrepreneurs and staffs.

We are
also
facing this lack of commitments in residential communities.
Before
, a family would
move
into a neighborhood, socialize and localize themselves
intimately
for years,
sometimes
generations may develop a sense of mutual
trustability
with the local.
Now
,
because
of rampant migration from one locality to another,
people
are becoming strangers in their
own
alley.
As a result
, community support is diminishing every day,
especially
in urban areas, and families are transforming to estranged groups of
people
in an
otherwise
- crowded landscape.

In conclusion
,
change
is
good
as long as it is circumspect,
however
,
change
is
bad
whenever it
is done
just
for the sake of it.
Therefore
, we
must
check
the frequency of
change
, while keeping our minds open, and remember that all that we may perceive as
old
and
used
are
also
that we
have to
lose, which may
very
well be all that we have.
What do you think?
  • This is funny writingFunny
  • I love this writingLove
  • This writing has blown my mindWow
  • It made me angryAngry
  • It made me sadSad

IELTS essay Changing jobs and residences frequently is a very common scenario nowdays. Do you believe that this is good for one's future?

Essay
  American English
4 paragraphs
334 words
6.0
Overall Band Score
Coherence and Cohesion: 6.0
  • Structure your answers in logical paragraphs
  • ?
    One main idea per paragraph
  • Include an introduction and conclusion
  • Support main points with an explanation and then an example
  • Use cohesive linking words accurately and appropriately
  • Vary your linking phrases using synonyms
Lexical Resource: 5.5
  • Try to vary your vocabulary using accurate synonyms
  • Use less common question specific words that accurately convey meaning
  • Check your work for spelling and word formation mistakes
Grammatical Range: 6.5
  • Use a variety of complex and simple sentences
  • Check your writing for errors
Task Achievement: 6.0
  • Answer all parts of the question
  • ?
    Present relevant ideas
  • Fully explain these ideas
  • Support ideas with relevant, specific examples
Labels Descriptions
  • ?
    Currently is not available
  • Meet the criteria
  • Doesn't meet the criteria
Recent posts