There are many different opinions on the best way to reduce crime. Some people say that long term prison
is the only way to curb crime, whereas others say that education, vocational training and rehabilitation are
better. This essay intends to analyse both perspectives.
There are many arguments given by those who advocate longer terms in prison to combat crime. They say
that there are criminals who are a risk to the society, such as murderers. They cannot be made to mix with
society. There are also mentally insane people such as serial killers who should be kept away from the
people. lf such criminals are set free soon, they will reoffend and so should be in penitentiaries for longer
terms.
On the other hand, there are many convincing arguments given by those against long term imprisonment.
Firstly, in traditional prisons, petty criminals learn a lot about crime, and so when they leave prison they
commit even more crime. ln other words prisons act as universities of crime. So petty offenders like
shoplifters and pickpockets should be given some vocational training and education. lt is a well-known fact
that the basic causes of crime are poverty, illiteracy and unemployment. So, if we provide education and
job training, then we would be removing the causes of crime. lf criminals are rehabilitated by some form of
employment, then they would certainly not re-offend.
Furthermore, the prisons are expensive to maintain. The government can spend that money on other
important matters such as education and healthcare. This would ease some burden off the government's
shoulders. The petty and minor criminals can also be employed in some community service projects after
providing education and vocational training.
Summing up, we should hate the crime and not the criminal. To fight crime we should focus on the causes
of crime. Education and job training help to rehabilitate the criminals. Longer terms in prison are not the
answer to fight crime. Focus should be on reforming the criminals.
There are
many
different
opinions on the best way to
reduce
crime
.
Some
people
say that long
term
prison
is the
only
way to curb
crime
, whereas others say that
education
, vocational
training
and rehabilitation are
better. This essay intends to
analyse
both perspectives.
There are
many
arguments
given
by those who advocate longer terms in
prison
to combat
crime
. They say
that there are
criminals
who are a
risk
to the society, such as murderers. They cannot
be made
to mix with
society. There are
also
mentally insane
people
such as serial killers who should be
kept
away from the
people
.
lf
such
criminals
are set
free
soon
, they will
reoffend
and
so
should be in penitentiaries for longer
terms.
On the other hand
, there are
many
convincing arguments
given
by those against long
term
imprisonment.
Firstly
, in traditional
prisons
, petty
criminals
learn a lot about
crime
, and
so
when they
leave
prison
they
commit even more
crime
.
ln
other words
prisons
act as universities of
crime
.
So
petty offenders like
shoplifters and pickpockets should be
given
some
vocational
training
and
education
.
lt
is a well-known fact
that the basic causes of
crime
are poverty, illiteracy and unemployment.
So
, if we provide
education
and
job
training
, then we would be removing the causes of
crime
.
lf
criminals
are rehabilitated
by
some
form of
employment, then they would
certainly
not re-offend.
Furthermore
, the
prisons
are expensive to maintain. The
government
can spend that money on other
important
matters such as
education
and healthcare. This would
ease
some
burden off the
government
's
shoulders. The petty and minor
criminals
can
also
be employed
in
some
community service projects after
providing
education
and vocational training.
Summing up, we should hate the
crime
and not the
criminal
. To fight
crime
we should focus on the causes
of
crime
.
Education
and job
training
help
to rehabilitate the
criminals
. Longer terms in
prison
are not the
answer to fight
crime
. Focus should be on reforming the
criminals
.