Although both of passage and lecture discusse about decline ih the population of cedar trees, lecturer casts doubt on which is written in the article. The passage described tree reason for this declination of cedar trees. However, the professor argued these reasons.
At the first, in the passage mentions to the insects, especially cedar bark beetle, as a cause of declining of the cedar trees. Yet the lecturer states that these trees not only are resistance enough to these insects, but also, in fact, are much more resistance compared to the other tree species in face these insects.
Second, in the passage brown bears is proposed to account of decreasing of cedar trees. The professor, however, disagrees with this idea. The passage sates that clawing of the bears results in being weak tress. The professor explains that there are somewhere that there is not brown bear there, but cedar polulation is declining. Therefor, this idea that brown bear could be an reason for decreasing the cedar trees is a unreasonable idea.
Third, in the article climate change is mentioned as an another reason for this changes in the cedar polulation. the lecturer, however, casts doubt on this idea by explanation about decline of cedar treea in different areas with different temperature. He belived that some of these trees was able to grow in the low temperature regions. So the idea of effect of climate in the cedar tree polulation could not a fundamental reason for this change.
Although both of
passage
and lecture
discusse
about decline
ih
the population of
cedar
trees
, lecturer casts doubt on which
is written
in the article. The
passage
described
tree
reason
for this declination of
cedar
trees
.
However
, the professor argued these reasons.
At the
first
, in the
passage
mentions to the insects,
especially
cedar
bark beetle, as a cause of declining of the
cedar
trees
.
Yet
the lecturer states that these
trees
not
only
are resistance
enough
to these insects,
but
also
, in fact, are much more resistance compared to the other
tree
species in face these insects.
Second, in the
passage
brown
bears
is proposed
to account of decreasing of
cedar
trees
. The professor,
however
, disagrees with this
idea
. The
passage
sates that clawing of the
bears
results in being weak tress.
The
professor
explains
that there are somewhere that there is not brown
bear
there,
but
cedar
polulation
is declining. Therefor, this
idea
that brown
bear
could be
an
reason
for decreasing the
cedar
trees
is
a
unreasonable
idea
.
Third, in the article climate
change
is mentioned
as an another
reason
for
this
changes
in the
cedar
polulation
.
the
lecturer,
however
, casts doubt on this
idea
by explanation about decline of
cedar
treea
in
different
areas with
different
temperature.
He belived
that
some
of these
trees
was able to grow in the low temperature regions.
So
the
idea
of effect of climate in the
cedar
tree
polulation
could not a fundamental
reason
for this
change
.