Search
Tools
Listening
Reading
1. Academic
2. General
Writing
1. IELTSWriting Checker
2. IELTS Writing Samples
Speaking

Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.

Both the reading and the article deal with the issue that whether Peary had reached the North Pole in 1909 or not.

Both the reading and the article deal with the issue that whether Peary had reached the North Pole in 1909 or not. 2bg6x

Both the reading and the article deal with the issue that whether Peary had reached the North Pole in 1909 or not. The article proposes three arguments to support that Peary did reach the pole, yet the lecturer cast doubt on them and provides three counterarguments respectively. To begin with, the article mentions that the committee confirmed Peary's accounts that he reached the north pole. In contrast, the lecturer argues that the committee is not objective because it funded Peary's trip and the committee did not examine the records carefully. And that is the contradiction between the article and the lecture. While the author mentions that a recent expedition and Tom Avery's trek support pear's claim, the speaker holds a different viewpoint. The lecturer contends that avery and peary travel differently. To be more specific, Avery did not carry as much weight as Peary did because the food was dropped by airplane. In addition, Avery traveled in a favorable climate condition but Peary did not. With that in mind, the lecturer does not agree with what is mentioned in the article. Thirdly, the author accounts that Sun's position calculated from Peary's photo provides strong evidence that he reached the pole. However, the lecturer illustrates that the photo was 100 years ago taken by the primitive camera. In other words, the photo is fuzzy and the shadow in the photo faded and is too blurred. By mentioning that the evidence is unable to establish accurately, the scholar opposed the point made in the article. To sum up, the author and the lecturer share different opinions over the issue of Peary's claim. Armed with the counterarguments, the speaker voices her dissent and contends the three points made in the passage.

Both the reading and the You use this word too often, consider replacing it withpiece
article
 deal with the issue that whether Peary had reached the North You use this word too often, consider replacing it withlegrodbeammaststickflagpole
Pole
 in 1909 or not. The You use this word too often, consider replacing it withpiece
article
 proposes three arguments to support that Peary did reach the You use this word too often, consider replacing it withlegrodbeammaststickflagpole
pole
, yet
 the You use this word too often, consider replacing it withprofessorinstructor
lecturer
 cast doubt on them and provides three counterarguments respectively
.

To This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :initiatecommence
begin
 with, the You use this word too often, consider replacing it withpiece
article
 mentions that the committee confirmed Peary's accounts that he reached the north You use this word too often, consider replacing it withlegrodbeammaststickflagpole
pole
. In contrast
, the You use this word too often, consider replacing it withprofessorinstructor
lecturer
 argues that the committee is not objective This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:due to the factin light of the fact thatowing to the fact that
because
 it funded Peary's trip and the committee did not examine the records carefully
. And that is
 the contradiction between the You use this word too often, consider replacing it withpiece
article
 and the lecture.

While the author mentions that a recent expedition and Tom Avery's trek support pear's claim, the speaker holds a This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:various
different
 viewpoint. The You use this word too often, consider replacing it withprofessorinstructor
lecturer
 contends that Possible spelling mistake found.Averyveryeveryavertaversaver
avery
 and Possible spelling mistake found.Pearyparapartypairpreypairs
peary
 travel differently
. To be more specific, Avery did not carry as much weight as Peary did This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:due to the factin light of the fact thatowing to the fact that
because
 the food was dropped
 by airplane. In addition
, Avery traveled in a favorable climate condition This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:on the contrary
but
 Peary did not. With that in mind, the You use this word too often, consider replacing it withprofessorinstructor
lecturer
 does not This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :acquiesce
agree
 with what is mentioned
 in the article.

Thirdly
, the author accounts that Sun's position calculated from Peary's You use this word too often, consider replacing it withpicturelikenessimagesnapshotprintportrait
photo
 provides strong evidence that he reached the You use this word too often, consider replacing it withlegrodbeammaststickflagpole
pole
. However
, the You use this word too often, consider replacing it withprofessorinstructor
lecturer
 illustrates that the You use this word too often, consider replacing it withpicturelikenessimagesnapshotprintportrait
photo
 was 100 years ago taken by the primitive camera. In other words
, the You use this word too often, consider replacing it withpicturelikenessimagesnapshotprintportrait
photo
 is fuzzy and the shadow in the You use this word too often, consider replacing it withpicturelikenessimagesnapshotprintportrait
photo
 faded and is too blurred. By mentioning that the evidence is unable to establish accurately
, the scholar opposed the point made in the article.

To sum up, the author and the You use this word too often, consider replacing it withprofessorinstructor
lecturer
 share This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:various
different
 opinions over the issue of Peary's claim. Armed with the counterarguments, the speaker voices her dissent and contends the three points made in the passage. 