Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.
Check Your Text it's free

Both the reading and lecturer are about a public practice which was submitted in late 1960s in the United State.

Both the reading and lecturer are about a public practice which was submitted in late 1960s in the United State. oR193
Both the reading and lecturer are about a public practice which was submitted in late 1960s in the United State. It was called " let it burn" . Whenever a fire was being occurred, it could burn itself quickly without any intervention. The reading provides an example of Yellowstone’s forest fire which was harmed with this approach. The lecturer casts doubt on the claims made in the article and she finds all of arguments dubious. She believes that forest fire is a natural phenomenon which does not have destructive consequences, but also it would provide positive conditions in a cycle. First of all, the author of reading declares that huge section of trees and small plants chocked up and died up due to Yellowstone’s fire. This point is challenged by the professor. She points out that after a forest fire, new plants would be colonized and meanwhile plants have a chance for diversifying. Some small planets also start growing while formerly they did not have such a great opportunity. For example, when some tall trees or plants are killed by fire, there is not any shadow for blacking the growth of other small vegetation, thus they start burgeoning. Or some seeds which could have not already been opened, would be cracked. Secondly, the article contends that this practice has negative effects on animals. The food chain and animals' habitats may be destroyed; conversely, the professor expresses that after burning, small places will be displayed in the forest floor and animals such as rabbit or mice can live in those mentioned places; consequently, these small animals are the main resource of food for large predators such as wolf or fox. Finally, the reading passage states that if people rely on the aforementioned practice, burning will reduce the number of tourists and as a result, local business would be harmed in this way. This argument is rebutted by the lecturer. She poses that this phenomenon does not occur every year. The combination of low rain, strong wind cause fire to become massive; however it hardly occur. So after burning Yellowstone, next year visitors came back again.
Both the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
reading
and lecturer are about a public practice which
was submitted
in late 1960s in the United State. It
was called
Possible spelling mistake found.
&quot
;
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
let
it
Possible spelling mistake found.
burn&quot
;
Don't put a space before the full stop
.
Whenever a
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
fire
was
being occurred
, it could burn itself
quickly
without any intervention. The
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
reading
provides an example of Yellowstone’s
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
forest
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
fire
which
was harmed
with this approach. The lecturer casts doubt on the claims made in the
Use a comma before 'and' if it connects two independent clauses (unless they are closely connected and short).
article and
she finds
Consider using "all arguments" or "all of the arguments".
all of arguments
dubious. She believes that
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
forest
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
fire
is a natural phenomenon which does not have destructive consequences,
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
but
also
it would provide
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
positive
conditions in a cycle.

This phrase is redundant. Consider using "first".
First of all
, the author of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
reading
declares that huge section of trees and
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
small
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
plants
chocked up and
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
died
up due to Yellowstone’s
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
fire
. This point
is challenged
by the professor. She points out that after a
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
forest
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
fire
, new
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
plants
would
be colonized
and meanwhile
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
plants
have a chance for diversifying.
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
Some
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
small
planets
also
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
start
growing while
formerly
they did not have such a great opportunity.
For example
, when
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
some
tall trees or
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
plants
are killed
by
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
fire
, there is not any shadow for blacking the growth of other
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
small
vegetation,
thus
they
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
start
burgeoning. Or
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
some
seeds which could have not already
been opened
, would
be cracked
.

Secondly
, the article contends that this practice has
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
negative
effects on animals. The food chain and animals' habitats may be
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
destroyed
;
conversely
, the professor expresses that after burning,
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
small
places will
be displayed
in the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
forest
floor and animals such as rabbit or mice can
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
live
in those mentioned places;
consequently
, these
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
small
animals are the main resource of food for large predators such as wolf or fox.

Finally
, the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
reading
passage states that if
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
people
rely on the aforementioned practice, burning will
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
reduce
the number of tourists and
as a result
, local business would
be harmed
in this way. This argument
is rebutted
by the lecturer. She poses that this phenomenon does not occur every year. The combination of low rain, strong wind cause
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
fire
to become massive;
however
it hardly
Did you mean "occurs"?
occur
.
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
So
after burning Yellowstone,
next
year visitors came back again.
What do you think?
  • This is funny writingFunny
  • I love this writingLove
  • This writing has blown my mindWow
  • It made me angryAngry
  • It made me sadSad

IELTS essay Both the reading and lecturer are about a public practice which was submitted in late 1960s in the United State.

Essay
  American English
4 paragraphs
354 words
6.0
Overall Band Score
Coherence and Cohesion: 5.5
  • Structure your answers in logical paragraphs
  • ?
    One main idea per paragraph
  • Include an introduction and conclusion
  • Support main points with an explanation and then an example
  • Use cohesive linking words accurately and appropriately
  • Vary your linking phrases using synonyms
Lexical Resource: 5.0
  • Try to vary your vocabulary using accurate synonyms
  • Use less common question specific words that accurately convey meaning
  • Check your work for spelling and word formation mistakes
Grammatical Range: 6.5
  • Use a variety of complex and simple sentences
  • Check your writing for errors
Task Achievement: 6.0
  • Answer all parts of the question
  • ?
    Present relevant ideas
  • Fully explain these ideas
  • Support ideas with relevant, specific examples
Labels Descriptions
  • ?
    Currently is not available
  • Meet the criteria
  • Doesn't meet the criteria
Recent posts





Get more results for topic:
  • Both the reading and lecturer are about a public practice which was submitted in late 1960s in the United State.