Both the lecturer and the article are discussing the appearances of professors on TV and its advantages and disadvantages. The article claims that professors as well as universities and society get something useful from such events. However, the lecturer states that no one really benefit from TV shows and for scholars it can even result in bad consequences.
First and foremost, in the article it was said that it's a good practice for teachers to participate in TV programs. It can improve their reputation within other scholars and make more people engaged into his or her ideas and investigations. However, the lecturer has an opposite opinion. She is assured that TV shows can cause damage to the reputation of the scholars. They can even be ignored during valuable meetings and conferences. Consequently, it will become a tough call to ask for money to make investigations. One more point, is that TV shows are very time-consuming. Professors need to spend time on the preparations and on the travel itself instead of having lectures with students.
Secondly, the article says that public is interested in science and such programs are informative and captivating for them, considering the fact that they don't have an opportunity to meet with scholars personally. Nevertheless, the lecturer claims that listeners don't really benefit from shows. TV programs don't like to create and broadcast a very deep and detailed information, wich is important for science. All such programs contain are academic titles and background material related to the talk.
Both the
lecturer
and the
article
are discussing the appearances of professors on TV and its advantages and disadvantages. The
article
claims that professors
as well
as universities and society
get
something useful from such
events
.
However
, the
lecturer
states that no one
really
benefit from TV
shows
and for
scholars
it can even result in
bad
consequences.
First
and foremost, in the
article
it
was said
that it's a
good
practice for teachers to participate in TV
programs
. It can
improve
their reputation within other
scholars
and
make
more
people
engaged into
his or her
ideas
and investigations.
However
, the
lecturer
has an opposite opinion. She
is assured
that TV
shows
can cause damage to the reputation of the
scholars
. They can even be
ignored
during valuable meetings and conferences.
Consequently
, it will become a tough call to
ask for
money to
make
investigations. One more point, is that TV
shows
are
very
time-consuming. Professors need to spend time on the preparations and on the travel itself
instead
of having lectures with students.
Secondly
, the
article
says that public
is interested
in science and such
programs
are informative and captivating for them, considering the fact that they don't have an opportunity to
meet
with
scholars
personally
.
Nevertheless
, the
lecturer
claims that listeners don't
really
benefit from
shows
. TV
programs
don't like to create and broadcast a
very
deep and detailed information,
wich
is
important
for science. All such
programs
contain are academic titles and background material related to the talk.