Humans have been battling the tropical disease malaria since at least the late fourth century B C This debilitating and deadly disease is actually a parasite which reproduces in humans and is spread through the saliva of mosquitoes when they suck blood fr

Recently, there has been a ton of debate as to the effectiveness to eradicate malaria. More specifically, In regards to thr passage the writer puts forth the idea that there are three processes we can eradicate malaria. However, the lecturer is quick to point out that there are some serious flaws in the writer's claims. In facts, the professor believes these three processes are not effective, and address, in details, the troube with each point made in the reading text. Firstly, the author of the reading states that by using prescription medicine we can reduce malaria. Some professionals, however, in the same field stands in firm opposition to this claims. In the listening, for example, the lecture claims that these madicine only effective for specific species. He goes on to say that new specises are not killed by those medicine. Secondly, one group of scholar represented by the writer thinks that by killing the mosquito that transfer the malaria we can eradicate it. Of course, though, not all experts in this sector belives this is accurate. Again the professor specifically address this point when he states that in this process the most of the mosquito fly away. Additionall he notes that fishes and other species can be affected. Finally, the author wraps his argument by positing that by sterilize the male mosquito we can eradicate the malaria. Not surprisingly, the professor takes issue by contending that these sterilised male can not mate with the femail mosquitos and the mating ability of these mosquito also deleted. To sum up, both the witer and l; ecturer halds conflicting view about the effectiveness to eradicate malaria. It is clear that, they will have trouble in finding common ground on this issue.